Share.

23 Comments

  1. “Beautiful” has long since departed, “data” is hanging on by a thread, so all that will be left is the “is”

  2. rclonecopymove on

    Most of Elon’s don’t count though?

    The International Agreement on Breeding, Racing and Wagering
    Article 12

    3.1
    >Any Foal resulting from or produced by the processes of Artificial Insemination, Embryo Transfer or Transplant, Cloning or any other form of genetic manipulation not herein specified, shall not be eligible for recording in a Thoroughbred Stud Book approved by the International Stud Book Committee.

    https://www.ifhaonline.org/default.asp?section=IABRWtest&area=2

  3. SomethingAboutUsers on

    I have 3 kids and for the fucking life of me I cannot imagine wanting more. The 3rd one was an oopsy, I was totally fine with just 2.

    I suppose the difference between me and these fuckbois is that I am involved in my kids’ life and it keeps me so damn busy I have nothing more for more kids.

  4. They want a legacy. And they can financially support many kids.

    I think we are just jealous. Yeah he probably can’t be an effective father to that many kids, but many kids don’t have a father. Financial comfort + a mother is perfectly fine honestly. I only had a mother and I had 0 financial comfort.

    How many kids can a man with a full time job support/meaningfully parent?

  5. Electrical-Topic1467 on

    This Reddit should be called sigma data, for both the math factor and the memes

  6. Seems like any Schmoe could leave those numbers in the dust. Almost like these guys aren’t really serious. And then there’s the late Epstein, who if I’m not mistaken died still stuck at 0. He invested many millions in his NM baby ranch and came up empty.

  7. bourbonandvinyl on

    The dots themselves, yes. But each year dot also corresponds to a number on the Y-axis. So most of these are 0 kid dots.