Share.

25 Comments

  1. Northern New England and the Northern Rockies/Great Plains areas don’t really have violent hoods like how the other states do. That in itself is a major mortality risk for black people, who are often the victims there. Another possibility might be access to food in those areas. Black people in those areas also tend to know how to hunt or farm, or they don’t have the same worries about food deserts as a black person in the South or an inner city might. That means more nutritious food and less processed junk foods in their diet.

    They also are sparsely populated by black people, so a few of them that are living well will make a significant change to the rates.

    Although, I have 0 idea why Nebraska is so negative.

  2. Montana has less than **7,000** black people…in the entire state. 0.6% of the population. The state is 89% white.

    This is like saying my emissions from private jet travel is 0 lmao

  3. A different map!

    It’s the US with data about something but the colours are in different places!

    😲😲😲

  4. ManufacturerVivid164 on

    Wow, it looks like the safest place for black people is among white republicans. Who knew?

  5. My guess is that a higher percentage of black people moved to those states specifically for jobs and tend to be higher income.

  6. dancingbanana123 on

    Looking at this made me realize something: if you’re a researcher trying to figure out if race plays a significant role in someone’s ability to survive a disease, or maybe just survive illness as they age in general, how would you go about setting up that study while making sure to adjust for social impacts in a country like the US, with historic issues like red zoning and such? Like there *are* diseases where race plays a significant role, but how do you actually adjust for that?

  7. Legendary_Lamb2020 on

    There are so few Black people in Montana, and the only time I cross paths with them are in the cities near our handful of full sized hospitals. But I think the data set is so small its uninformative.

  8. After looking at this map I’m super curious how much of this comes from white people being less concentrated in cities

  9. Timely-Group5649 on

    Those blue states don’t count.

    You cannot extrapolate this statistic in states that have fewer than a dozen POC at any one time.

  10. EndorphnOrphnMorphn on

    This feels like a poor visualization to me. If the vast majority of the country has a longer life expectancy for white americans than black americans, why show a map of “here’s where and how much black americans live longer” with mostly negative numbers? Why not just invert the map?

  11. The question is, does the gap grow because 1 thing is higher or lower than usual? or both sides are going to 2 different directions? like, who’s at fault for the gap?

  12. DigitalArbitrage on

    OP was obviously trying to make this into a political argument by choosing red and blue. The states that showed up as red and blue are just different than expected.

  13. So, I’m pretty sure I can explain this one.

    The blue states are all relatively or very rural. Also, they are the furthest away from the core of the southeast (at least by difficulty of travel, boats helped a lot prior to automobiles) and have an extremely different climate.

    Only richer people could afford to move there. Lots of people from the south wouldn’t event want to move there. So, the black people in those states were probably more wealthy to begin with and most likely chose to move there because of a significant economic opportunity. No one in Georgia moves to Montana to be a janitor.

    There’s also the fact that rural life is dangerous. Accidents, exposure to chemicals, and lack of access to healthcare all shorten life expectancy.

    So, you have factors lowering life expectancy for white people and massively raising it for black people.