Do you know that I said a few days ago that the PNL, PSD, and AUR senators put in a condition that from now on, if you make more than 400,000 RON, you will be obliged to hire a lawyer?

In short, UNBR, UNPPR and OCJR (the legal professional groups) have proposed through lobbying a project to compel contractors to take their services. In fact, you won’t have anywhere – hardly any company? Lawyer to establish it. Do you grow a little and have a turnover of 400,000? Lawyer to stamp your AGM decisions.

I tried to bring this to the public eye on the 22nd and since then they have received an unfavorable opinion and it appeared a little in the press.

Today, the juridical committee of the senate gave the bill a favorable opinion by which it not only supported the bill, but even made it even stronger, introducing another category of protected liberals – legal advisors, and eliminating the compliance obligations of lawyers.

Dacia, before they checked the legality of the documents and somehow assumed that (they protected the legal circuit – that’s what the draft law aimed at), now those obligations have been removed. Lawyers only stamp as required, that’s all the law requires, without specifying why they stamp or what to do before that.

What I failed to tell you last time when going over the project is that companies like StartCo, Aprobat can say goodbye, because from now on a lawyer is obliged to certify the constitutive documents. So you won’t be able to start your company without a lawyer involved. Bad luck if it doesn’t suit you! Prepare the commission, brother, if you want to be an entrepreneur.

Besides the fact that it is not allowed by EU directive 2017/1132 (because you must be able to create your own company with the online template, which they do not foresee), that it harms the economy in a recession, it is also a shameful project, because it is clearly one that aims to maximize a caste interest.

Thanks to the media pressure exerted by me and other people, we managed to bring this to the attention of the public as much as possible, but not enough yet. Otherwise, a favorable opinion would not have been given so quickly.

I tell you very honestly, the profession of lawyer, notary public (and legal professions in general) seem to have decided that they are also a state in the state (not only the services, the politician and others who are protected from the application of the law), and therefore they also impose their turn of frequences on us.

Big appetite, dear Romanians, because the legal fees are coming everywhere. And after this project and the success that will come, I bet that they will add more.

The legal fee when you get married, when you go to file a document on ghiseul.roetc. In any case, their approach proves to me that they don’t care, and when people are not satisfied with their services, they will solve it simply – they will force you to pay or suffer the consequences.

https://www.senat.ro/Legis/Lista.aspx?cod=27024

I invite you to send to the press, and tell them in broad terms this:

  1. They want to introduce a legal fee on all companies with over 400,000 in the AGM.
  2. You must have a lawyer to set up your company because the constitutive act must go through them. You pay the stamp duty.
  3. The PNL legal mafia joined forces with the PSD and some of the AUR and make the law in Romania, for their clan interests. Because not only the underworld clans are to be feared, there are others worse.

Maybe I’m paranoid and I don’t see the advantage of giving money everywhere, regardless of the size, to some people who in the past have proven that they massively abused the monopoly they obtained, not for your good but for theirs.

The same individuals and lawyers who do tax evasion and brag about it.

Cum se asigura profesiile liberale ca prostii le umplu visteria – L339/2025
byu/incorporo inRomania



Posted by incorporo

Share.

6 Comments

  1. Sa ne intelegem, deja se duce din rau in foarte rau. Este un proiect de lege care desi a fost criticat larg de tot mediul anteprenorial, inclusiv de avocati, merge mai departe pentru ca el vizeaza sa creeze o piata artificiala.

    Incalca Directive UE (ce conteaza), incalca principii economice (da-le naibii), face rau anteprenorilor in austeritate (cry me a river).

    Trebuie presiune publica, pentru ca cu astia altfel nu se poate.

  2. CommanderLoneStar on

    Cu intentia de a da o critica constructiva: nu am inteles mare lucru din ce ai scris si am recitit o parte — si mi-ar placea sa inteleg

    Poti descrie un pic legea si mai ales, contextul legii. Cred ca de aici apare confuzia personala.

    Am deschis linkul, dar nu am reperat legea pe primele pagini si nu vreau sa caut pe fiecare pagina in parte.

    De ce va trebui sa platesc aceasta “taxa avocatiala” pe [ghiseul.ro](http://ghiseul.ro) si ce inseamna aceasta taxa (care este baza pentru ea) ?

  3. Nu stiu in ce masura directiva Europeana interzice statelor sa aiba propriile proceduri, caci in Germania orice modificare in AGA necesita avizul notarului.

    Legat de procedura de la noi, daca ai o companie care genereaza o cifra de afaceri si vrei sa faci modifcari in AGA si AC, daca nu apelezi la un avocat, cine face documentele? Poate te ajuta contabilul, desi nu este de competenta acestora ca sa faca modifcari in AGA si AC. In practica, daca vrei sa ai un registru corect si robust, trebuie sa apelezi la un avocat.

  4. Când ești antreprenor la început ai nevoie de servicii juridice corporative, dar îți iei de nevoie nu că ești obligat. Când ajungi la 400k cifra de afaceri, ai trecut prin câteva situații și ai deja cunoștințe minime juridice să poți face singur acte corporative.

    De obicei la cifrele mai mari avocații sunt utili să fentezi fiscul, să te muți în sedii fictive {cu mii de firme la o adresă), să faci evaziune, să optimizezi profiturile, să pui administratori fictivi sau interpuși, etc. și să scapi basma curată în colaborare cu prietenii lor din justiție.

  5. daguerrotype_type on

    1. Pari sa te plangi ca au adaugat si consilierii juridici, dar asta simplifica treaba pentru orice firma care are deja angajat unul. Doar ii da aluia mai mult de lucru. Ca zici ca e profesie liberala, dar nu e, ca sunt angajati. Practic au facut legea mai blândă, tu zici ca e mai agresiva.

    2. Practic ce te plangi tu poate fi aplicabil pentru toata activitatea notarilor. Ca oamenii merg la notar doar pentru ca cere legea sa mearga.