Share.

25 Comments

  1. Data source: [US Census Bureau intercensal estimates analyzed by Annie E Casey Foundation KIDS COUNT Data Center](https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/99-total-population-by-child-and-adult-populations?loc=1&loct=1#detailed/2/2-53/false/1096,1/39,40,41/416,417)

    Tools: python, jupyter, matplotlib, geopandas, pandas, polars

    [Blog post with full replication code, walkthrough, and analysis](https://aaronjbecker.com/posts/comparing-child-share-population-1990-vs-2024-by-state/)

  2. Sounds like a combination of people living longer and everything being more expensive for larger families to be less desirable.

  3. I feel like these colors should be swapped, with the darker colors being higher population of under 18. Not surprised by the results on this one, higher cost of living/less religion = less kids.

  4. I think it’s almost always more intuitive to have lighter, less saturated colors depict smaller numbers. Or warmer colors for higher and cooler colors for lower.

  5. GhostofInflation on

    An aging population into a monetary system that requires a growing population. What could possibly go wrong?

  6. communitarianist on

    Utah now has below replacement fertility rates. Still above average for USA, but the notion of a bunch of 8 person families running around is at least 25 years out of date.

  7. iknowiknowwhereiam on

    Daycare and camp is prohibitively expensive. College will be even more. I would love more children but having them has almost become a luxury and I can’t afford more

  8. Regular-Engineer-686 on

    It’s why immigrants are so important. Without them the economy would collapse, but xenophobia rules the country now.

  9. he_must_workout on

    It would be interesting to see the biggest delta between years on a similar heat map. Utah looks like it’s the biggest decliner though still the highest share of the younger population.