Britain one of least ‘nature-connected’ nations in world – with Nepal the most

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/01/britain-one-of-least-nature-connected-nations-in-world-with-nepal-the-most

Posted by bcoolhead

Share.

17 Comments

  1. Longjumping-South610 on

    Bullshit – London is one of the greenest cities in the world having more greenspace than many others and sadiq khans policies are encouraging more eco friendly and sustainable environments . Oxbridge invest in greenery and we have so many national parks and protected areas

  2. Seniorita-Put-2663 on

    Two good books on this topic are “Caliban and the Witch” about how the enclosures prevented people to have access to wild land. Another book is Agri- Culture by Jules Pretty. The industrial revolution really messed with British peoples’ connection to the land.
    Luckily we still do have lots of green spaces to walk about in but that’s not really a true connection with nature.

  3. Wide_Tune_8106 on

    With them wanting to build new build estates on green land and people opposing it being called ‘NIMBYs’ or whatever I am not shocked

  4. whatsgoingon350 on

    Not surprising we are a small country with a growing population its hard to say on one hand we need to build more affordable homes and on the other we shouldn’t build so much as its destroying nature.

    Two solution come to mind aquire more land or slow down population growth. That would solve both problems.

  5. Anansi-the-Spider on

    Don’t worry we are busy building new homes and solar farms on the remaining nature now

  6. That’s clearly nonsense. We have more green spaces and natural areas than most developed countries.

    In fact, wouldn’t this whole list just be in order of what percentage of the population lives in rural areas.

  7. Existing_Macaron_616 on

    You really can’t have it both ways. We have a better country than Nepal, much of this progress coming at the cost of natural spaces. Ultimately, if the land weren’t as it is now, we probably wouldn’t be here, so there is no point in ruing it.

  8. Nice_Back_9977 on

    Reading the article its not exactly clear how they measured this, but its not based on how much people want to protect nature or enjoy spending time in it but about nebulous concepts around spirituality which in my experience most Brits don’t buy into.

    If a survey or interviewer asked me if I felt a spiritual connection to nature or other species I would absolutely say no. If they asked me if I felt it was important and good for mental and physical health and needed protecting then I’d be an enthusiastic yes.

  9. Desperate_Caramel_10 on

    If we build lots and lots of midrise flats then we can use less land but NIMBYs hate flats too.

  10. The study’s methodology is deeply flawed, particularly in its ranking of Japan among the world’s least “nature-connected” nations. Japan is over 68% forested (one of the highest proportions in the developed world) and has an extensive system of national parks and satoyama landscapes integrating human life and biodiversity. Concepts like *shinrin-yoku* (forest bathing), seasonal observances such as *hanami* and *momijigari* and the animist foundations of Shintō all reflect an enduring cultural intimacy with nature. Yet, because the study relies on a handful of self-reported psychological questions about feeling “part of nature,” it misreads this cultural embeddedness as disconnection. The result reveals more about how survey instruments fail across languages and contexts than about any genuine distinction between Japanese society and the natural world.

  11. Makes sense given that we’re in the bottom 5% of countries in terms of nature depletion and the worst in Europe. Hard to connect to what doesn’t properly exist.

  12. Least connected UK, English Speaking Canada, Germany Japan and Spain. Notice a trend? – all part of imperial culture. I guess it makes sense if you can takeover what you see as just land, you don’t care about the nature that inhabits it.

  13. New-Doctor9300 on

    Perhaps, instead of building more houses, we..stop selling existing housing stock to large companies for them to charge extortionate rent for? Or stop millionaires from being able to buy more than one home? We have the housing but it simply isnt available.

  14. Well, yeah. There is essentially no natural habitats here at all. What the locals call “natural” is more or less all man made farmlands or tiny low value woodland.

  15. I blame the British public and parenting. I used to work in outdoors educatotion 99 percent of children don’t know how to make a fire using sticks or build a shelter. In my opinion that is totally down to parents not taking their children out and teaching them to enjoy nature of which is a vicious circle.