Share.

36 Comments

  1. Data from IATA [https://www.iata.org/en/publications/safety-report/interactive-safety-report/](https://www.iata.org/en/publications/safety-report/interactive-safety-report/)

    Date range 2002-june 2025

    There is more there so you can drill down to find ‘fatal passenger in Europe’ etc if you want to.
    Python matplotlib code and data at [https://gist.github.com/cavedave/69b717d1e1740343bfe92be4ebe20abb](https://gist.github.com/cavedave/69b717d1e1740343bfe92be4ebe20abb)

  2. Real question: how do they crash (have an accident) “parked post arrival” or is that another way to say they were struck by something?

  3. slouchingtoepiphany on

    OP did a fine job with this. Another interesting display might be to collapse relate categories into (1) Going Up; (2) Going Down; (3) Cruising. As long they can maintain flight w/o taking off or landing, things look fine. 🙂

  4. Seems like Landing is the problem, ban planes from doing that and safety should get much better

  5. “Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that’s what gets you.”

  6. Yeah, it’d be nice to see “landing” broken out into “was already having issues and then landing went poorly” and “everything was/seemed fine until landing”. Though that might not be in the original data, I haven’t looked at it.

  7. I’d be curious what an “accident” is and how its defined? Most “accidents” happen during “landing” but when you view “fatal accidents” “approach” dominates and other phases are much closer to landing.

    To me, this suggests “accident” includes a lot of minor things. I’m more interested in the big shit though…

  8. Offsetting the landing phase with parachute jumps would drastically reduce the statistical probability of an accident?

  9. flip6threeh0le on

    think the bar thats missing in all of these graphs is a “no accidents on flight” bar

  10. Man, if you’re a pilot and you crash your plane during preflight, you should think about a different career.

  11. A perspective worth depicting is % of accidents resulting in fatalities by phase of flight. IIRC, Takeoff is actually the most dangerous phase if you go by least survivable accidents

  12. Ok_Income_8002 on

    Actually the VAST MAJORITY of flight accidents occurs when the plane lands (was in the air and touch the ground)

  13. This is why the 9/11 guys were willing to takeoff but unwilling to land. It was just too dangerous.

  14. Annoying, it would be nicer to die on takeoff so you don’t have to sit through a boring plane ride

  15. When I was learning to fly my instructor pointed out the basic logic behind this fact.

    Airplanes are built to fly, it’s what they “want” to do. To execute a successful landing, you have to make the plane stop doing its natural thing at a precise moment in time at a precise location.

    Try parking your car where you want it by shifting into neutral and coasting, without using the brakes. That’s a bit like landing a plane.

  16. ispeakforengland on

    Stuff like this makes people believe flying is inherently dangerous. Would love to see a chart with a % chance of it happening on a flight. Bet we’re looking at 0.00x% or even less.

  17. And this is why all those clever ideas about parachutes on planes and similar don’t really make much sense.

    More than 95% of incidents happen while the plane is on the ground or launching or landing.

    Once you are high up in the air you are mostly safe, it is getting anywhere near the ground that is the dangerous part of air travel.

  18. Are these people on the plane having an accident or the plane having an accident?

    Like someone bumping their head, falling over, with enough injury to be recorded. So yeah when landing people getting out their seat before it’s landed and then whack, stay in your damn seat till told to do get up.