> Survey finds 60% of key cities councils are planning to sell assets to meet costs of adult and children’s social care.
Ironically, it’s things like social clubs and sports centres that can massively help in reducing the load on social care. They should be investing in them and making them more accessible to all, not getting rid.
These spaces in our communities help people socially, help promote our physical health and our mental health.
mileseverett on
If it’s anything like the companies i’ve worked for in the past, they’ll buy the facilities, give them a cheap but fresh makeover and then let the facilities fall into disrepair over years
InternationalTie4784 on
Those clubs would probably be more valuable if they were replaced with social housing and other amenities closer to the people and homeless
NGeoTeacher on
Of course they do, because when hasn’t selling off assets brought prosperity and efficiency to our services?
BlindStupidDesperate on
Honestly, what do most councils have left to sell?
Most are struggling to meet the legal minimums like effective social care and refuse collection thanks to nearly 20 years of austerity and managed decline.
the-rood-inverse on
The death spiral continues. Every asset. Every social good will be sold to an “investor” who will maximise profit by ensuring the minimum number of people have access to that asset.
Successful_Boss6858 on
Selling off assets to solve a deficit is idiotic financial planning.
IsyABM on
Fuck.
I can’t afford £20 padel sessions. £3 badminton session at the local leisure centre is how poor folk like me get some fun in.
mixxituk on
Scotland had the right ideal selling its own bonds
They could do this with the new devoluted super counties
Ey lass, got some reet Yorkshire bonds for thi
eldomtom2 on
It’s not going to get any better unless the national government takes responsibility for paying for social care, but that means raising taxes and people bitching and moaning about “the productive being taxed to help the unproductive”…
coffeewalnut08 on
This is one of the things I don’t quite get about English devolution plans.
If many councils are broke af, how could they possibly use new devolved powers effectively?
The financial situation of local authorities needs sorting.
LeaguePuzzled3606 on
This will have no negative long term effects whatsoever /s
EntirelyRandom1590 on
This has been happening in Wales already but mostly Comnunity Asset Transfers where a lease for a facility is given to a local charitable organisation/company that handles the building. Greatly reduces council liabilities and day to day. Gives communities greater control (we’ve modernised ours with solar, heat pumps and additional income streams etc).
appletinicyclone on
put a tax on billionaires if they live in specific areas to cover social and connective things that benefits them through making the path for a safer more community oriented society
Astriania on
It’s just a terrible attitude of short termism and council funding being removed to the point they can’t function.
Councils shouldn’t be required to pay for adult care, it should be a national level thing (part of the NHS probably). And arguably not for SEN schooling either.
Running facilities like this, which are a social asset that improves the standard of living in the council area, is one of the core functions of councils.
Nights_Harvest on
Don’t have to pay for social care if you are not providing it.
16 Comments
> Survey finds 60% of key cities councils are planning to sell assets to meet costs of adult and children’s social care.
Ironically, it’s things like social clubs and sports centres that can massively help in reducing the load on social care. They should be investing in them and making them more accessible to all, not getting rid.
These spaces in our communities help people socially, help promote our physical health and our mental health.
If it’s anything like the companies i’ve worked for in the past, they’ll buy the facilities, give them a cheap but fresh makeover and then let the facilities fall into disrepair over years
Those clubs would probably be more valuable if they were replaced with social housing and other amenities closer to the people and homeless
Of course they do, because when hasn’t selling off assets brought prosperity and efficiency to our services?
Honestly, what do most councils have left to sell?
Most are struggling to meet the legal minimums like effective social care and refuse collection thanks to nearly 20 years of austerity and managed decline.
The death spiral continues. Every asset. Every social good will be sold to an “investor” who will maximise profit by ensuring the minimum number of people have access to that asset.
Selling off assets to solve a deficit is idiotic financial planning.
Fuck.
I can’t afford £20 padel sessions. £3 badminton session at the local leisure centre is how poor folk like me get some fun in.
Scotland had the right ideal selling its own bonds
They could do this with the new devoluted super counties
Ey lass, got some reet Yorkshire bonds for thi
It’s not going to get any better unless the national government takes responsibility for paying for social care, but that means raising taxes and people bitching and moaning about “the productive being taxed to help the unproductive”…
This is one of the things I don’t quite get about English devolution plans.
If many councils are broke af, how could they possibly use new devolved powers effectively?
The financial situation of local authorities needs sorting.
This will have no negative long term effects whatsoever /s
This has been happening in Wales already but mostly Comnunity Asset Transfers where a lease for a facility is given to a local charitable organisation/company that handles the building. Greatly reduces council liabilities and day to day. Gives communities greater control (we’ve modernised ours with solar, heat pumps and additional income streams etc).
put a tax on billionaires if they live in specific areas to cover social and connective things that benefits them through making the path for a safer more community oriented society
It’s just a terrible attitude of short termism and council funding being removed to the point they can’t function.
Councils shouldn’t be required to pay for adult care, it should be a national level thing (part of the NHS probably). And arguably not for SEN schooling either.
Running facilities like this, which are a social asset that improves the standard of living in the council area, is one of the core functions of councils.
Don’t have to pay for social care if you are not providing it.
So stupid.