
Radiographer who turned CT scans of six female patients into 3D ‘lifelike’ images of their naked torsos and genitals is struck off
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15309439/Radiographer-turned-CT-scans-six-female-patients-3D-lifelike-images-naked-torsos-genitals-struck-off.html
Posted by Forward-Answer-4407

12 Comments
Well that’s not a headline I expected to see early saturday morning!!
>*But he was found to have been ‘sexually motivated’ carried out the acts for his own ‘gratification’.*
I do have to wonder how they were able to establish this when he wasn’t caught doing anything inappropriate with the images, he didn’t take them home on a drive or email them anywhere, they just sat on an archive system available to other staff members, and it doesn’t appear he had a prior history of doing this after 40 years in the job.
Well you break the rules you get rightly fucked over.
That rule is called ‘getting caught’.
I say this knowing multiple radiographers, surgeons and doctors and what they discuss behind closed doors. Is it right to joke about patients? Nope. But it happens. Is it wrong? In my opinion, unless you want to collapse the entire health system, it only is wrong if you get caught. Go to any hospital and they’ll have a box, file of shit they x-rayed that people stuffed in them. Go to any hospital and listen in the staff rooms and doctors general chat. They talk. They find humour in the dark and grim. It’s human nature.
Take the surgeon that initialed a patient’s liver during surgery. That patient had zero damage. In fact reported:
“Although, the tribunal said, it “**accepted that no lasting physical damage was caused to either patient**”,”
So what was the problem … oh right …
“Bramhall’s actions had caused one of them “significant emotional harm”.”
The act of reporting it caused the emotional harm. But we don’t discuss that. We don’t discuss the fact that by publicly outing that act, caused all of the harm.
So does this radiographer deserve to get struck off. Absolutely. He bought the emotional damage to patients … *by getting caught.*
His surname is Hardman. Nominative determinism strikes again?
you do what you can when you are no longer able to look at porn online. thanks, online safety act!
I think it’s time we started using a different phrase to ‘Struck Off’ for stories like this.
For the love of God, just watch porn!!!
You have access to the biggest stream of content in human history, *how* is this a decision made??? Put this man away!
Tbh, I had somehow expected this article to be about a CT scan being turned into a 3D plastic printing model ~ however it was about him refreshing himself on the technological settings of the scanning software before his shift, to apply skin to CT scans of JUST females genital parts. Anything else beyond this is an assumption.
Moral of the story ~ if you are going to do this, don’t forget to include men… 🤣.
>He was sacked and **took up a part time role in the NHS**
So presumably that NHS hiring process has incredibly lax recruitment processes, seems they didn’t even contact his old employer or made themselves aware of the investigation with the professional body
by struck off i assume they have been sentenced to prison?
The trick to this is just find a willing participant
This reminds me of around 10 years ago when I was in uni, one of our research teams pioneered a technique to do some kind of scan (I think it was x-ray) rapidly enough to make a video.
They decided to include a gif of them fucking in the x-ray machine in the newsletter and it was one of the more arousing things I have seen.
So no judgement. But don’t do it to unsuspecting patients.
think about this next time you go through the scanners at the airport