We live in a post-truth world. Even 5 years ago the phrase “pics or it never happened” made sense. As we go into 2026, showing me pictures as proof of something makes it less credible not more.
Economy-Ad-4777 on
bruuuh shit is scary, how long until photos cant be used in court?
Negative_Equity on
I remember being told don’t believe what you see on the Internet. I’m 42 and still live by that mantra. It’s a shame the generation that coined the phrase now believes everything they read on the Internet.
Critical thinking is dead.
Visual_Astronaut1506 on
If it’s on social media, surely the person who originated the image can be traced back and prosecuted?
Depending on how they framed the post of course.
recursant on
The AI appears to have hallucinated a house that isn’t actually there.
eldomtom2 on
Not sure they should have publicised this. If it becomes common knowledge that you can cancel trains with an AI image…
MrRorknork on
It’s got to the point where I mistrust most things I see on the internet that are even slightly out of the ordinary. It’s sad that things have got to the point that unless it’s first hand from a credible source, it’s bullshit until proven otherwise.
Embarrassed_Grass_16 on
“A BBC journalist ran the image through an AI chatbot which identified key spots that may have been manipulated.” And that’s the extent of their analysis of the image.
How are these people paid to work full time?
ElectronicBruce on
Wonder how long this will take to become an offence..
meharryp on
This line here shows why we’re so fucked
> A BBC journalist ran the image through an AI chatbot which identified key spots that may have been manipulated.
General purpose LLMs are absolutely awful at this job but aim to satisfy the users request. If you give it any image and say “identify likely AI generated artifacts” it will try as hard as it can to do that, going as far as to point out shit that isn’t even there
The fact BBC journalists don’t know this and are relying on the same things that generate these lies to provide them with truths is extremely concerning
wkavinsky on
The fakers are complete dicks, but I’d much rather a train be cancelled because of a fake picture that it’s collapsed, than a train be not cancelled and try to go over a collapsed bridge.
No_Gur_7422 on
The Russians don’t need to prepare a bombardment and invasion, they can just make some pictures of the results and the government will surrender …
12 Comments
We live in a post-truth world. Even 5 years ago the phrase “pics or it never happened” made sense. As we go into 2026, showing me pictures as proof of something makes it less credible not more.
bruuuh shit is scary, how long until photos cant be used in court?
I remember being told don’t believe what you see on the Internet. I’m 42 and still live by that mantra. It’s a shame the generation that coined the phrase now believes everything they read on the Internet.
Critical thinking is dead.
If it’s on social media, surely the person who originated the image can be traced back and prosecuted?
Depending on how they framed the post of course.
The AI appears to have hallucinated a house that isn’t actually there.
Not sure they should have publicised this. If it becomes common knowledge that you can cancel trains with an AI image…
It’s got to the point where I mistrust most things I see on the internet that are even slightly out of the ordinary. It’s sad that things have got to the point that unless it’s first hand from a credible source, it’s bullshit until proven otherwise.
“A BBC journalist ran the image through an AI chatbot which identified key spots that may have been manipulated.” And that’s the extent of their analysis of the image.
How are these people paid to work full time?
Wonder how long this will take to become an offence..
This line here shows why we’re so fucked
> A BBC journalist ran the image through an AI chatbot which identified key spots that may have been manipulated.
General purpose LLMs are absolutely awful at this job but aim to satisfy the users request. If you give it any image and say “identify likely AI generated artifacts” it will try as hard as it can to do that, going as far as to point out shit that isn’t even there
The fact BBC journalists don’t know this and are relying on the same things that generate these lies to provide them with truths is extremely concerning
The fakers are complete dicks, but I’d much rather a train be cancelled because of a fake picture that it’s collapsed, than a train be not cancelled and try to go over a collapsed bridge.
The Russians don’t need to prepare a bombardment and invasion, they can just make some pictures of the results and the government will surrender …