Moretti CHF 8k IV Rente?

It won’t. This whole thing will be swept under the carpet. 

In my experience, Switzerland has a real problem in acknowledging something could be wrong. In this case 40 people (and increasing) died due to systematic failure. (No checks, no enforcement) 

Cases like this are so frustrating for the people who genuinely need the IV (Invalidity Insurance) and have to jump through so many hoops to get even basic support. If true, it’s not just about the money, it’s about the erosion of trust in our social security system

InsideParadeplatz overemphasizes the Morettis’ culpability in their articles while downplaying the responsibility of the local Swiss authorities. There’s a whiff of nepotism in Crans Montana. Among the seven councilors who make up the local administration,including the one in charge of security, who’s been in that position since 2018, three apparently share the same family name., Two others also share the same family name. All five belong to the same political group. It seems the security officer from 2015/2016 hasn’t yet been criminally investigated; they started with the inspector from 2017.

It’s impossible to have an IV disability pension of 7k Fr. even assuming contributions as a Geschäftsführer to the SVA and the mandatory private pillar system from 2015 to 2024 (since he’s no longer listed as Geschäftsführer) with a declared taxable salary of, say, 10k per month. The press mixes up a lot of information, making it hard to follow. For instance, the annual inspection requirement only applied if the establishment was officially registered as a nightclub, not as a lounge bar with official closing hours at 2 a.m. The loans amount to 5.5 million, not clear if hypothek or business/ private credits. If the Morettis refinanced their initial loans through other guarantee backed credits you can’t add them just simple one to another.

While i used to quite like Inside Paradeplatz reporting on banking stuff (which they’re good at), their reporting on the Crans-Montana thing is ridiculously inaccurate and way too sensationalist, IMHO.

Inside Paradeplatz has written a lot of BS on this bar fire matter, unfortunately and – at this point – I wouldn’t believe (or at least take with “a kilo of salt” (not a grain of salt)) any of their articles on it.

I mean, they were the ones who first **misreported** the whole “paid all cash, because are no mortgages in the PUBLIC property register register excerpt” and kicked off all these unsubstantiated “all cash mafia money” reports in other media.

*Well, no s..t, Mr. Sherlock, the PUBLIC register excerpt NEVER lists mortgages, you f…ing id..ts.*

Not sure why, but either they are so desperate for clicks at the moment that they will just come up with the most ridiculous headlines and the most convoluted inaccurate representation/regurgitation of the known facts and plain rumors / speculations formatted and re-written in a heavily biased (“tendenziös”) way – or there must be some kind of personal connection between the owner/reporter of IP to a victim, IMHO. Not sure, why Mr. Hässig (owner of IP, AFAIK) seems so “hässig” in this matter.

Heck, in the linked article i find the following errors/misrepresentations/omissions:

* Again, IP seem to be using a public property register “extrait” (that does NOT LIST MORTGAGES – only the private “extrait” not available to the public will!) to claim “they have no mortgages”, where actually from leaked investigation files (that other, more professional media outlets got access to), there ARE mortgages on all properties.
* As far as is known from one article (Canard Enchaine) Mr. M gets some kind of (maybe health related ?) pension, but that seems to be paid from an entity in France, so it is NOT an IV pension paid by the Swiss IV (“Invalidenversicherung”)!
* Also, pensions are income, so not sure why IP is making such a fuss about “how can you get a mortgage if you get a large pension as an income”?
* IP misreports about their cars “Diese kauften sie …”, when from the investigatory files it seems ALL of their cars have been leased by their LLCs (maybe with the exception of a really beat up 4×4 car with French plates that stands in front of the M.s house and is likely not used/driven anymore).
* Also IP misrepresents IMHO the whole “COVID payments used for buying cars” thing. As far as i know from many press reports, it’s not clear whether it was a COVID credit or a COVID “a fonds perdu” payment. The payment/credit was paid to an LLC which used it to make lease payments on a Maserati owned by the LLC. The authorities did not find anything illegal about this, BECAUSE IT IS NOT ILLEGAL! It “looks bad”, yes, but contrary to all the media want to give a “sensationalist spin” on this, it’s perfectly fine legally. Heck, the COVID payments (especially if they were – which we don’t know for sure, yes, could maybe also be a credit – “a fonds perdu” payments) were also intended to compensate business owners for lost income due to government lockdown. So these payments could also have been used for almost anything (except paying dividends to the owners of the LLC) that’s business related – which a luxury car promoting your luxury (or at least luxury-looking) bar is. If there was no lockdown, they would have earned the same (or more) money from running the bar, and no-one would have batted an eye.

It is written. 6000 / year. Not 8000 monthly.