Extract from pdf EFTA00079513.pdf. Testimony of a victim of French citizenship in the Epstein affair. If you have the courage, read the 38 pages, there are quite a few French “celebrities” cited. (Balkany, Frank Ribery….)

Svp, il n’y aurait pas un sub dédié où vous pourriez partager ~~vos trucs~~ vos pdf ?

edit:
J’édite parce que ca fait jazzer 🙂
On est beaucoup à aller faire un tour sur [justice.gov/epstein](http://justice.gov/epstein) , je trouve ca naze de poster n’importe quel extrait sans analyse, sans recul, sans mise en relation, et juste copie-coller un extrait et mettre en titre : ” **Lisez les 38 pages**”.

Pour etre transparent, non, je vais mal de taper xxx pdf, xxxx pages mais je lirai plutôt le travail des journalistes d’investigations, qui le feront bien mieux que moi.

Faites un sub, faites de l’investigation collective et publiez vos rapports. Clairement, hors intelligence artificielle, seule une/des communautés pourraient avoir consulter l’integralité des documents.
développez la méthodologie mais surtout sensibilisez, rien que là, avec le combo titre + image, il faut reussir à répondre à ce genre de questions sur les sources:

>
– est-ce que ça vient des archives officielles des affaires epstein ?

>- qui parle ? “*une victime de citoyenneté Française*” (d’après l’auteur )

>- à qui ?

>- par quel moyen ?

>- pourquoi ?

>- à quelle date ?

>- est-ce vraiment une déposition?

>- est-ce un témoignage fiable ?

>- peut-on le mettre en lien avec d’autres documents ?

>- …

>

Si la modération laisse passer sans modération le moindre extrait on est pas rendu

I gave a USB stick to the police to make comparisons. I am

passed by Little Saint James, this island was not yet to belong to him, a

Muslim-born military found me confined to a room, he tried to

but I didn’t understand his language, frightened I backed off being very frightened,

not fed, not washed, in sexualized dress type sado-masochist (leather) that left

EFTA00079517

glimpse of my child’s body, and then I saw a man in a white tunic similar to the

Saudi men with little whiskers, who looked at me near the door, he

looked at me sadly and I was doubly, The Military and Jeffrey Epstein

spoke virulently outwards, he again tried to talk to me

indicating the word “rape” I understood “rapt” as the verb rapter. I couldn’t

acquiesce or respond to this soldier in uniform. Shortly before, Jeffrey Epstein told me

in a single word “shark” in French indicating the range of his arm, I do not

understood nothing, moreover, he often spoke to me in his native language and sometimes

EFTA00079518

incorporated a single word in French, it seemed crazy to me. He could see that I didn’t understand

not his tongue arid it seemed to amuse him.

I would like to know whether Mrs Marlene SCHIAPPA Secretary of State to the

French Prime Minister to the right, as the case stands, to ask for the

requisition, hastily made to Mr. Le Prefet de Paris, of the property

Min Paris who is owned by the Trust?

Je comprends RIEN

C’est une façon de parler très bizarre en tout cas.

>I would like, if my French complaint is accepted, to be able to make a re-enactment at the site, which is essential to my recognition and personal reconstruction.
[…]
I speak today, I take this risk to defend the child I was, and who died with repeated rapes I’m talking about today because child crime must stop, I speak today, because mothers are unfanted and young children harassed by unhealthy and conscious adults of the harm they do, harassment that is very hard to prove, mothers who are going to lose everything, who will not see their children grow up, who cannot answer for education and the affection they sincerely wish to give to their children, I speak today, because we were forced to pay 13 years of litigation fees that did not gave nothing, and that made us poor, despite the efforts and work, week after week, which my mother carried out without ever complaining, without being able to make projects for the future, I’m talking about today, because they sought to achieve my autonomy social, financial, but also the love I had for myself, and that I had with my mother, this violent separation was voluntary, in order to subject me to trafficking and sexual slavery in France but also on your soil. Yes I speak because I didn’t have to live in so much perversion, year after year, nor to see the French institution be used against the targeted victims of this network. I’ve never participated in what this network was asking for and I am proud to be who I am, despite that they destroyed me and the grave projective humiliations done to me, in every phase of my life and my development. Don’t deprive me of this (*ht. My power is speech. I had no ambition to be the scapegoat, nor a pain sufferer a deviapit, criminal and dysfunctional family and then society.

Putain de bordel de merde que c’est une girl boss.

J’espère qu’elle gagnera gain de cause comme elle le souhaite, mais putain qu’elle est forte à souhaiter revivre ça pour sa propre cicatrisation.

>She also said she had **”cow love”** with my uncle, we were small to hear that.

Cow love lol.

C’est l’amour vache, les ricains n’ont rien compris sur le moment.

putain j’ai lu le document c’est horrible

On va rappeler que, en soi, simplement être mentionné n’est pas moralement condamnable. Ça invite à chercher pourquoi la personne est mentionnée, par contre.

Par de pitié ou de bienveillance envers les criminels, mais pas non plus de chasse aux sorcières.

Je sais pas vous, mais y a tout simplement trop d’informations pour ne pas juste y passer sa vie, et en plus sans savoir ce qui est vrai, faux, déformé, truqué par les maga (exagéré ou minoré, caviardé)…

Ces documents servent surtout d’os à mâcher pour nous occuper j’ai l’impression, peu importe la vérité contenue dedans, qui a été expurgée pour ne qu’on puisse jamais confirmer ou infirmer les exactions de l’agent orange.

Béatrice Dalle et Virginie Despentes qui l’ont harcelé?

Il y a quand même énormément de noms quand même. Il faut voir la véracité des informations tout de même parce que c’est chaud.

“Her approach hinders the investigation and may prevent further complaints from arriving, Ms. SCHIAPPA prejudges the purpose of this case and multiplies the difficulties. In its functions, it has a duty of probity and non-concussion.” On doit comprendre de ce passage que Schiappa faisait (une fois de plus) entrave à la justice ?