Share.

19 Comments

  1. Agile_Tap_8057 on

    My favourite part of the article:

    “Architect Jayson Blight said the wavy glass facade was inspired by the Brisbane River.

    The Brisbane River does not have waves.”

    Edit: I took it as a lighthearted joke but the negatively framed title makes me think it wasn’t intended to be… Who knows

  2. 10 bucks says Langbroek will be there claiming this as a great achievement for the LNP, when it was started under the previous government. (Same thing goes for Nicholls and his bullshit hospital rescue plan.)

    And it’s not like Labor had control over flooding at the site.

  3. DillyDallyEnjoyerer on

    Must have been extremely easy for the ABC to report on this considering they’re just across the road.

  4. Saw Hamlet once in school, seen two other plays my whole life. Not really a place ill be attending. But goddamn do i like this building. Happy for part of my taxes to go to cool shit to support art in our city

  5. I dont know why the subtle jab at taxpayers funding this. Some people go to the theatre, some people go to sports stadiums. Some people have kids at schools, some people dont. Some people have to use hospitals lots, others only a little. We all share the cost around, it’s called living in a society.

  6. BackstageTurtle on

    The demand from the performing arts side is there. Brisbane has always been hard to get into as QPAC is fully booked.
    More shows, more art and enjoyment. More patrons. More people spending money on nights out. More performers and crew employed. It all passes along.

  7. AlbertsDad2911 on

    I really dislike the tone of this article, has tabloid fingerprints all over it. Used to get a lot better out of the ABC. Maybe a little excitement about a new theatre that looks great would be nice!

  8. DropkickUpKick on

    What a waste of taxpayer money, seriously if they build a theatre as cheap as possible and just added it… How much did that wavy glass cost extra despite it being a clear unnecessary excess and has no function when flat glass would have done the exact same job or have no glass altogether, save on that cost and just have a concrete wall?

  9. ActiveTravelforKG on

    Why did you feel it necessary to change the article title?

    >Queensland Performing Arts Centre to open Glasshouse Theatre after four-year delay

  10. I remember seeing the original architect renders for this which did not show any columns behind the glass, knowing full well that would not be possible. They’ve disguised them quite well but I do think it was slightly disingenuous to omit them from the renders.

  11. The original title is in particularly bad faith by leading readers to assume the taxpayer is having to pay for the theatre and the delays, and then the article buries this line right toward the end “the cost blowout would not be borne by the taxpayer, but by the construction company”. smh

  12. Brisbane has needed the extra space for years, I don’t mind going to QPAC once every so often but the naysayers have no place being upset at this

  13. It’s a shame about the delay, but it’ll bring more stage shows, stand up comics and music performers needing a smaller stage than what Bris Convention centre nearby offers.

  14. I’m just glad the roadworks have finally finished…..and in true Brisbane style, there are now less lanes than before!

  15. AltruisticRope646 on

    I come to Brisbane for qpac mainly so I love this since means I may get to visit more.