Share.

18 Comments

  1. GreenEyeOfADemon on

    The destroy UNESCO World Heritage cities, while 20% and more of their populace have no indoor plumbing. They don’t want to improve their life, they only want to destroy other innocents’ life.

  2. jackthedandiest on

    Russia treats its money as expendable and tries its best to never admit it was all a mistake. They’ll be pushing and pushing for it “until the last Russian” (who’s not a part of the elite)

  3. Mysterious-Reaction on

    I find it hard to believe that the capital of Slovenia only has a budget of $300 million annually. 

    Similar population cities in the UK have much larger budgets like Coventry that has a budget of $1.6 billion annually

  4. KostiantynBulkov on

    I wouldn’t focus on how much rusia spent. I’d say that Ukraine was able to withstand this attack, and that more than 70% of air targets were shot down or suppressed. (I don’t know the actual percentage.)…

  5. All this money could be spent on remote Russian regions instead, where people live in awful conditions.

  6. I don’t want Moscow to continue existing as a cancerous tumor on the edge of Europe. They can not be trusted without very hard work and reform.

  7. When I was reading I was wondering how much a city like Ljubljana annual budget is.. Need to wonder no more! Stay strong Ukraine!

  8. I love how really disturbing information does not influence any reality. Starting Ukraine ending Epstein.

  9. Most_Grocery4388 on

    For comparison in case of a war the same attack would cost more for the EU to perform. EU equipment is just more expensive. So those are the costs you are looking for in case of any large military conflict