Close Menu
    Report finds two thirds of tip-offs about children in harm in NSW not investigated
    Australia

    Report finds two thirds of tip-offs about children in harm in NSW not investigated

    Share.
    View 10 Comments

    10 Comments

    1. befarked247 on

      That’s terrible stats. As someone who went through a custody battle 20 years ago. Though 95% of accusations of predatory behaviour from a parent against a child, only 2% are founded.

      Edit: at least back then.

    2. sherbertmelipnos on

      As a child who survived that shit decades ago, and still lives with horrible PTSD – my parents weren’t just not investigated, they were approved to become foster carers. I am no longer shocked by the perpetrators but I am by the bystanders and those who received reports and did nothing.

    3. heisdeadjim_au on

      Because an allegation isn’t proof. My sibling accused out stepfather of sexual assault because he grounded her, stopped her from sneaking out at 13 to be with her BF

    4. Ch00m77 on

      When one of the lowest funded state government departments is child protection and this is nationwide, not just NSW, it’s not a wonder why only the most heinous reports get investigated.

      Chronic underfunding is a big problem for staff retention and for providing adequate care for those in state care.

      There aren’t enough workers (because they dont have the funding to afford more staff, but they also pay workers shit money to do shit work.) Who the fuck wants to deal with that crap and get paid less than 100k, minimum.

      Workers who have excessive case loads of 30 families (that could be over 100 children for 1 worker)

      Nothing will change until this is seen as a sector worth valuing, and ever since its conception, it’s been dogshit.

    5. SoberBobMonthly on

      “…245,000 credible tips…”

      For those about to whinge about false accusations, these particular group of accusations are focused on because the CREDIBLE ones (meaning likely from a professional who has training to report these things, such as teachers, doctors, the types of people who see physical evidence (example given in there is chronic headlice, which genuinely is a sign of quite severe neglect).

      There’s probably millions of reports overall, and they are focusing on the higher prioritt ones

    6. eternaldaisies on

      This is entirely due to a lack of funding. There aren’t enough caseworkers, and the caseworkers that are at DCJ don’t last because they’re overworked and underpaid. You can’t get enough high quality, experienced workers if everyone burns out and leaves after a couple of years in the role.

      When a child at risk is not allocated a caseworker, it’s not because DCJ don’t care. It’s because they’ve got 5 available slots that week, and there are 5 other kids at even greater risk. I don’t envy the role of whoever has to make those decisions.

    7. MouseEmotional813 on

      Chronic under funding for so many services. The media and others constantly trying to force the government to spend less results in these conditions.