I think it’s either nostalgia bait at this point or just an assumption (probably correct) that the aesthetic of these movies is still more known than the series or author themselves
Pacyfist01 on
It’s better than using AI
zubergu on
Movies might get old but their target audience doesn’t. Perfectly reasonable thing to do.
Also, you just know that they won’t pay any artist for new cover but generate some shitty lion/Jesus in winter scenery amalgamation and call it a day.
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
Key_Arrival2927 on
I used to hate book covers using the movie adaptation. But then I saw book covers made by AI.
FnFanta on
Było trochę w prawo przesunąć 😭🛌🏻
ShinyTotoro on
and..?
Realistic-Safety-565 on
Free cover graphics.
Imblueabudeeabudie on
Those movies aged pretty well and are still beloved so it makes sense
peghunnicutt on
they’re beloved movies
m64 on
They have paid for the licence, so they are going to use it. It probably still differentiates their edition from others.
seraf5 on
Tbh I always liked movie book covers and I usually try to buy those when I get the chance. A shame that Harry Potter never got movie covers. I really liked the first ones that we got, but the next one’s are really not for me.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
wydua on
O moj boże czy to fredi fazbar
AntsLikeBoliedCarots on
Who is the publisher
Jenotyzm on
It’s cheaper and much easier to publish reedition, which doesn’t need making another deal with the holder of the copyright, than creating new edition from scratch.
Infinite_palladin on
They will change it when something better comes up
18 Comments
I think it’s either nostalgia bait at this point or just an assumption (probably correct) that the aesthetic of these movies is still more known than the series or author themselves
It’s better than using AI
Movies might get old but their target audience doesn’t. Perfectly reasonable thing to do.
Also, you just know that they won’t pay any artist for new cover but generate some shitty lion/Jesus in winter scenery amalgamation and call it a day.
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
I used to hate book covers using the movie adaptation. But then I saw book covers made by AI.
Było trochę w prawo przesunąć 😭🛌🏻
and..?
Free cover graphics.
Those movies aged pretty well and are still beloved so it makes sense
they’re beloved movies
They have paid for the licence, so they are going to use it. It probably still differentiates their edition from others.
Tbh I always liked movie book covers and I usually try to buy those when I get the chance. A shame that Harry Potter never got movie covers. I really liked the first ones that we got, but the next one’s are really not for me.
[deleted]
O moj boże czy to fredi fazbar
Who is the publisher
It’s cheaper and much easier to publish reedition, which doesn’t need making another deal with the holder of the copyright, than creating new edition from scratch.
They will change it when something better comes up
What’s the problem
Those are not the first ones