It is not a definitive figure (that arrives at the end of April), but if Italy did not go below 3% it would be a great setback for the government which had staked everything on this in the December budget. For Giorgetti it’s always the fault of the super bonus (do you have a problem? are you sad? A terrible flood? The locusts? it’s always the fault of the super bonus…)

The most important macroeconomic policy objective of Meloni and Giorgetti – the return of the deficit below 3% and the exit from the European infringement procedure – has not yet been achieved. The Istat data communicated yesterday froze the Government: Italy in 2025 is at 3,1%. However, the institute specifies, the data is not definitive: the “number” that will be officially communicated in Brussels will be available in the spring, after the consolidated public administration account.

The Istat data for 2025 actually have more shadows than lights. Last year GDP grew by only 0.5%. While the overall tax burden was 43.1%increasing compared to the previous year (it was 42.4%), due to a growth in tax and contribution revenues (+4.2%) higher than that of GDP at current prices (+2.5%). The issue of tax pressure is mainly addressed by Matteo Renzi, who for months has been asking Meloni to account for the burden of taxes and inviting the minority to put the Government in difficulty on what was supposed to be one of the strong points of the legislature. It is no coincidence that Renzian Faraone talks about «Dracula government». Again, the dem Misiani recalls that at the beginning of the legislature the Government inherited a tax pressure of 41.7%: “In fact, last year Italian families and businesses paid over 31 billion euros in taxes and contributions more than what they would have paid if the tax pressure had remained at the level of three years before”.

Returning to the deficit, the result of 3.1% marks an improvement compared to 2024, when it stopped at 3.4%. Nonetheless, public debt rose to 137.1% (it was at 134.7% in 2024). As mentioned, it is an evolution of the macroeconomic framework that could call into question the exit from the EU procedure for excessive deficit, postponing the “normalization” of public finances to 2027. It is also a political problembecause even the pre-election maneuver would be conditioned by the primary objective of returning below 3%. For the moment the majority forces are trying to see the glass half full: for Ylenja Lucasellideputy economic manager of FdI, the data on the deficit “is good news for Italy and confirms the seriousness of the choices made by this Government regarding public accounts”.

https://www.avvenire.it/politica/doccia-gelata-sul-deficit-ed-effetto-guerra-leconomia-italiana-nel-2026-parte-in-frenata_105274

Posted by sr_local

Share.

12 Comments

  1. Il Superbonus purtroppo è un facile capro espiatorio perché ha fatto danni enormi oggettivamente e quindi olè lo si abusa anche.

  2. se siete ancora in tempo fareste meglio a scappare, ci aspettano anni molto, molto peggiori degli anni peggiori vissuti dai nostri padri e nonni

  3. Io credo che essere più equilibrati nei giudizi verso il governo (almeno sotto il profilo della politica economica) farebbe bene anche agli anti-meloniani. Nessuno dice che c’è un nuovo miracolo economico in corso, ma negare i risultati raggiunti sotto il profilo economico (bassa disoccupazione, fiducia nei mercati, calo spread, promozioni del rating, borsa sui massimi, ecc.) per alimentare la narrativa del “è tutto un disastro” (per lo
    0,1 di deficit in più lol) li fa apparire poco credibili. Mi sembra il discorso sulle rate del PNRR, a sentirli dopo la seconda rata non ci avrebbe dato più un soldo per mancato raggiungimento degli obiettivi, e invece…se succede la stessa cosa tra qualche mese con la procedura di infrazione che si fa?

  4. Same_Inspection_3064 on

    Superbonus. Reddito di cittadinanza. Parassiti dell’ISEE. E ho detto NON tutto

  5. Tricky-Task-1149 on

    Ed aggiungiamo che se non fosse stato per il PNRR portato a casa da Conte oggi non avremmo nemmeno quel misero +0,5% di crescita.

    Però che strano: negli anni il cui il superbonus c’era la crescita era a record europeo, centravamo tutti gli obiettivi europei E le agenzie di rating internazionali davano un outlook positivo al debito italiano (cioè dicevano che no, in realtà non c’è alcun “buco del Superbonus”). Oggi che non c’è più e la politica industriale del governo è semplicemente fare condoni e sperare in bene, la situazione è l’esatto opposto.

    Perché? Com’è potuto succedere? Ah, quale mistero!