Share.

45 Comments

  1. Will backfire in kremlin’s face.

    vatniks moved on from being best NATO salesmen, to expanding, along with USA, to best nuclear weapons proliferation salesmen. And it’s only 2026.

  2. Successful-Try-8506 on

    Sure, because abandoning their nuclear weapons worked out so well for Ukraine.

  3. IamInternationalBig on

    So what’s Russia gonna do, invade a NATO country?

    That would be the end of Russia.

    Sorry Russia, you are now irrelevant.

  4. No-Intention-4753 on

    r/russiawarns yes yes, as always. Eat shit Putin, do not attack neighbors and you’ll never experience those defensive measures they put in place, simple as that. 

  5. BillyWillyNillyTimmy on

    This is the Russian equivalent of the Cuban missile crisis. I understand their panic.

    But as we’ve seen, their threats are completely empty, because they cannot afford to start a war with Europe (I do not count NATO as I believe the USA will refuse to come to aid due to Agent Krasnov).

  6. Consistent_Catch9917 on

    Mimimimi.

    We will aim nuclear weapons on you. Oh we already did, well we will aim them extra evily, so better look out …

  7. Stop invading innocent countries and there’s no need for nukes. Let’s not pretend Russia didn’t cause this themselves.

  8. Russia has no more leverage over this. The entire world remembers what happened to Ukraine after they gave them to Russia for security guarantees.

  9. I think Russia needs to realise that the potential nukes we might be getting wouldn’t be Russian ones, so backfiring isn’t a real concern.

  10. Wineandbikes on

    Don’t do what we don’t want you to do, otherwise we won’t like what you are doing…

  11. fiendishrabbit on

    Should have thought of that Russia before you blatantly started breaking treaties and agreements with your neighbours.

    The war in Ukraine and the end of Finlandization is a prime example of the FAFO principle on an international level.

  12. Finland is not about to host nukes. That’s not what the change to the law is about.

  13. I think it’s only fair, Russia is hosting nukes on the other side of the border so this just balances things out.

  14. Many-Gas-9376 on

    It wasn’t a move to “host” nuclear weapons. Not going to comment further when even the headline is a lie.

  15. Don’t put up a fence and cameras or we will be forced to break into your home, meth head neighbor warns

  16. Overall_Swordfish883 on

    the nordics + baltics and poland along with the netherlands and belgium should create a joint umbrella.

    Have france+germany cooperate together.

  17. ProfessionalAd352 on

    The irony of Russia warning it will backfire when their actions pushed Finland into NATO and to host nuclear weapons.

  18. Silberkralle on

    Honestly, after the invasion of Ukraine, I can’t blame any nation for wanting nuclear weapons anymore.

    Sure would love the world to be a safer place for everyone, but it’s clearly not possible by giving up weapons in front of an enemy.

  19. If the Putin regime is against something, you can rest assured that it is the right course of action.

    MAGA pedos and Russia responsible for nuclear proliferation.

  20. BarracudaDismal4782 on

    They talk like they have a say in the matter lol We don’t care what you think, Vladimir.

  21. you could just file this under lol, tf is russia going to do? invade Finland when they don’t even manage to beat Ukraine?

  22. Everything Putin has done in the last decade or so, has blown up in his face.

    Ukraine war, supporting Iran, getting Trump elected. Et cetera.

    Makes one wonder why Russians are so fond of this incompetent thug.

  23. It would be frontfiring though? Because they’ll be only bad for the kremlin and they’ll be looking at moscow mainly.

  24. I’m more and more convinced that more countries should get nukes. It seems the only deterrent that works.