Share.

16 Comments

  1. AccordingWarning9534 on

    wow, that’s high. I rarely drive.. first time I’ve seen a bowser price in a while

  2. reapingsulls123 on

    Yes E10 or 94 is usually cheaper than 91 and often by about 2 cents. Just comes down to ethanol being cheaper than the anti knocking agents used in petrol.

  3. Objective_Hawk_284 on

    Gutted I didn’t fill up 2 weeks ago when the light came on. The timing of my laziness to coincide with a middle eastern war 😟

  4. Ethanol has 3% less energy density than petrol. So you’ll use more and the $/km maths does not add up when you save 2c which is less than 1% saving. So until E10 becomes to be around 6-7c cheaper at the $2/L range, it will cost you more.

  5. It’ll be a very VERY cold day in hell before I taint my car with the shit that is E10 fuel.

  6. Because it has ethanol. Made with sugar cane, during WW2 most of the Pacific was supplied by Bundaberg distillery.

  7. username98776-0000 on

    Ayatollahs in Iran,
    Russians in Ukrainistan.
    We didn’t start the fire,
    It was always burning
    since the world’s been turning.

  8. AylmerIsRisen on

    About 3% lower energy density (comparing the two mixed fuels).

    Not knocking ethanol (race cars use it), but I make a vague attempt at doing the maths. And I have a tiny 40-litre tank, so every km counts. If it’s 2c/l difference I’m very definitely buying the regular over the e10, thanks.

    Re. octane (91 vs. 94). Do you know what the phrase [engine knocking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_knocking) means? If not, you should just buy ’91 or e10. 98 gives zero benefit.