Share.

    36 Comments

    1. Sarcastic_Brit314 on

      They’re a good idea in theory, but in practice those greenbelts include alot of dilapidated buildings and former industrial land that would be ideal for developing without sacrificing green spaces. But because of how they’re labelled it’s alot more work to get permission to build there.

    2. Joey_All_Bran on

      Why has Bath been labelled as Keynsham? Keynsham is the much smaller urban area between Bristol and Bath.

    3. KittyCatTyper on

      The government has recently passed a law changing the definition of greenbelt and removing many of its prior protections. Now if land is near a train connections they can build homes on greenbelt land but theyre still required to prevent the increase of further expansion, keeping the idea of greenbelt to its core concept back in the 1930s. The Grey belt map created by local areas should be released later this year.

    4. johnny_briggs on

      Can we not push Sunderland out into the sea to create some more green belt? I mean it’s right there.

    5. fuck_your_worldview on

      Keynsham feels a bit odd to be shown here, feel like its easily the least well known settlement shown and several of the towns around london not labelled would be more notable

    6. This is why you won’t find any US-style suburbia in the UK. A lot of new developments are being built on brownfield sites.

    7. The UK has approx 10 sq kilometres of defined wilderness. The Flow Country in Caithness.

      That’s all.

    8. opaqueentity on

      People do need to realise what a green belt is and what it isn’t. They are very different from people’s expectations

    9. Turbo-Badger on

      You’d be surprised how many people think any land that isn’t developed already is Green Belt and should be protected at all cost

    10. _fluffy_raptor on

      Sorry to break this to Bristol redditors but a lot of that green space in Brislington has just been or is about to be sold off for development:

      https://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2026-03-11/controversial-plans-to-build-homes-on-historic-grassland-set-to-be-approved

      And can’t post the pic but we had a flyer posted through my letterbox late last week, showing expansive plans for the meadow around me.

      If you thought the Bath Road was busy before, you’ve seen NOTHING yet.

    11. Emergency_Hotel_25 on

      maps like this always make me realize how little i actually know about geography. i once tried explaining where cities were in england and immediately embarrassed myself

    12. BrummieBandeja on

      It’s a great idea in principle, but it chokes the life out of cities. I’m from Birmingham, and it’s extremely difficult to find housing, we have a massive population, we can’t build further outwards and the council won’t allow (more than a few) high rise skyscrapers.

    13. Always worth noting that Golf Courses count as part of the green belt. Not all green belt land is equal in terms of public use and impact on the environment

    14. Billy_McMedic on

      Huh, didn’t really know about the Greenbelt in Tyne and Wear, was wondering why the Sunderland and Newcastle Metro Areas never really combined fully, with a narrow strip of undeveloped land separating the two, now I know.

      Honestly seems a bit of a waste that greenbelt separating the 2, it’s narrow and doesn’t really have all that much going on, not like a big national park or anything and I really can’t see the harm in just letting Tyne and Wear turning into one contiguous metro area by removing that narrow strip separating Gateshead/South Shields from Sunderland, would help a lot with increasing housing stock.

    15. Build public housing on green belts. Can’t enjoy the countryside if your basic needs aren’t met. Public only, not private, this sacrifice should be made for good only, not profit.

    16. The fact that Oxford and Cambridge have enormous green belts while none of the larger towns and cities surrounding them do tells you everything you need to know about what a batshit crazy system it is.

      Basically drawn up based on pure vibes and long forgotten local council politics 70 years ago, with absolutely no logic or connection to today’s world. But anyone who suggests changing them gets the wrath of the NIMBYs in full force.