Share.

16 Comments

  1. I would love to know how much of that is currently going to cool data centers. I’m having a hard time figuring out exactly how bad it is, with all the shouting from both sides.

    Also, I didn’t know we have a treaty obligation to leave a certain amount of water for Mexico. That’s interesting.

  2. PseudobrilliantGuy on

    I know Sankey diagrams don’t really work for two-way contingency tables, but I’d certainly be interested in that breakdown.

  3. guynamedjames on

    The Mexican allotment should be broken out separately for the uses side of the graph.

  4. Stiggalicious on

    People love to demonize almonds, saying it takes a gallon of water to grow a single almond.

    Really though almonds aren’t actually that bad when it comes to calories per gallon, fiber per gallon, and healthy fat per gallon. Almonds are small, but very densely packed with energy and nutrition. California grows most of the world’s almonds (about 95%), and uses about 1 million acre-feet of water per year.

    Alfalfa, in California, takes 4.4 million acre-feet per year.

  5. CuttingTheMustard on

    I’d love to see “waste” pulled out too. A huge amount of that forage and agriculture category just evaporates or runs off after it’s been pulled from reservoirs or irrigation ditches and that doesn’t seem to be accounted for.

  6. This implies 100% of the river is used up. I’d be curious to know what the percentages are if it were to show what flows into the ocean (or wherever it ends)

  7. I’m not sure there’s a single thing you can do that’s better for the environment than not eat beef. Water usage, deforestation, methane output. And that’s not even getting into the health benefits of cutting out red meat.

  8. Ok-disaster2022 on

    It boggles my mind honestly. I grew up in East Texas on a cattle ranch. We grew hay for the cows and in good years we’d sell and and on bad years we’d buy it locally. Like why not just get land east of the rockies to grow the grasses for cow feed?