I’d be interested to see how much of the shitshow associated with the new BOM site is directly because of them and not a result of internal factions, committees and miscommunication at BOM. There’s a reason heaps of people can’t watch Utopia. It’s because it’s too close to the truth.
Nakorite on
For the millionth time it wasn’t just a website. It was a full upgrade of pretty much every system feeding into the website. Saying it was botched is just click bait.
AntiqueFigure6 on
If you were inclined to giving the benefit of the doubt, you might wonder whether what happened was the external contractors delivered exactly what their customer wanted, it was just that the customer was out of touch with the end users.
But then you read that the contractors were Accenture, and desire to give the benefit of the doubt sort of evaporates.
Jarms48 on
16 million? No, 61 million (after blowouts).
kiwipetey on
96 million + 16 million ,not a bad job for a botched job,well done
newguns on
Just google BOM cost upgrade and see for yourself
Ok-Driver-2833 on
not the onion….
Jealous-Hedgehog-734 on
Accenture? It’s always the ones you suspect most.
OrbitalHangover on
I actually think the new site is fine. Ridiculous it cost $16M though
SpamOJavelin on
>It comes amid revelations that the new website cost more than $96 million to design — a far cry from the $4 million figure it originally claimed had been spent.
This isn’t a case where a $4M project blew out to $96M. There was a $4M redesign included along with $92M of other work, including a $78M content management system. As far as we know, everything planned went more or less to budget.
In regards to the website redesign, is there any indication that the company awarded the project – Accenture Australia – were responsible for any of the original issues? Because I’ve done contract work for State and Federal governments before, and it’s very likely that Accenture Australia made the new BoM app exactly as requested. The BoM didn’t hand the reins to a company and say ‘make something’, the BoM will be controlling the design and requirements. If the last project did keep its scope, budget and timeline – and I’ve seen nothing so far to indicate otherwise – then they seem like a pretty solid choice.
ol-gormsby on
The BoM, an organisation full of scientists (AKA people who are trained to think and examine issues thoroughly, methodically, and critically), and their own IT department…..
“BOM’s chief information and technology officer, Nichole Brinsmead, defended the extensions, saying the full complexity of the program was not understood in the early days.”
Ms Brinsmead should consider her position. Ditto the senior IT management. And definitely anyone and everyone who signed off the stages of that contract.
ShadowTux74 on
$19m contract, nice work guys. I wish i could get a $24m contract for proven incompetence, that way when they pay me for our $29m contract, it would be taxpayer money well spent, coming in just under our $35m budget.
SonicYOUTH79 on
*Checks if it’s a Betoota article*
It’s not…….
Carmageddon-2049 on
Accenture? Definitely made in India.
Come to think of it… that’s quite the hefty sum for an offshore development
visualdescript on
Fucking gov handing out cash to firms like Accenture and Deloitte to deliver software projects, it is mad.
VigorWarships on
I don’t know anything about website development but for 16 mill I could probably get it done better.
DuskHourStudio on
Only in Australia is incompetence rewarded.
Spagman_Aus on
I knew without clicking that Accenture had landed the deal. Good lord.
magnetik79 on
Why not give other quality shovelware companies like Wipro and InfoSys a go? /s
Wouldn’t it be nice if we actually had a functioning federal ICAC.
ThunderDwn on
Accenture. Guaranteed to be another cluster fuck.
Government tender efficiency in action!
C_Ironfoundersson on
Accenture: we convince your moron upper management that AI will solve all of their problems when we don’t even understand their problem set.
bernieinn on
Accenture built exactly what they were contracted to build, and the total contract wasn’t just for a website, but don’t let facts get in the way of a good story
Party-Art8730 on
So which higher up has a mate that runs Accenture?
27 Comments
Make it all make sense. Please.
Hope it not the ATO
I’d be interested to see how much of the shitshow associated with the new BOM site is directly because of them and not a result of internal factions, committees and miscommunication at BOM. There’s a reason heaps of people can’t watch Utopia. It’s because it’s too close to the truth.
For the millionth time it wasn’t just a website. It was a full upgrade of pretty much every system feeding into the website. Saying it was botched is just click bait.
If you were inclined to giving the benefit of the doubt, you might wonder whether what happened was the external contractors delivered exactly what their customer wanted, it was just that the customer was out of touch with the end users.
But then you read that the contractors were Accenture, and desire to give the benefit of the doubt sort of evaporates.
16 million? No, 61 million (after blowouts).
96 million + 16 million ,not a bad job for a botched job,well done
Just google BOM cost upgrade and see for yourself
not the onion….
Accenture? It’s always the ones you suspect most.
I actually think the new site is fine. Ridiculous it cost $16M though
>It comes amid revelations that the new website cost more than $96 million to design — a far cry from the $4 million figure it originally claimed had been spent.
This is simply wrong, and has been covered many times. The front-end re-design cost $4.1 million, as stated. There was also a huge infrastructure upgrade that cost an additional $92 million. The whole lot was [part of the ROBUST program which cost almost a billion dollars](https://www.itnews.com.au/news/boms-seven-year-technology-transformation-cost-866m-611371#:~:text=The%20Bureau%20of%20Meteorology's%20(BoM)%20seven%2Dyear%20technology,major%20outages%20in%202015%20and%20early%202016).
This isn’t a case where a $4M project blew out to $96M. There was a $4M redesign included along with $92M of other work, including a $78M content management system. As far as we know, everything planned went more or less to budget.
In regards to the website redesign, is there any indication that the company awarded the project – Accenture Australia – were responsible for any of the original issues? Because I’ve done contract work for State and Federal governments before, and it’s very likely that Accenture Australia made the new BoM app exactly as requested. The BoM didn’t hand the reins to a company and say ‘make something’, the BoM will be controlling the design and requirements. If the last project did keep its scope, budget and timeline – and I’ve seen nothing so far to indicate otherwise – then they seem like a pretty solid choice.
The BoM, an organisation full of scientists (AKA people who are trained to think and examine issues thoroughly, methodically, and critically), and their own IT department…..
“BOM’s chief information and technology officer, Nichole Brinsmead, defended the extensions, saying the full complexity of the program was not understood in the early days.”
Ms Brinsmead should consider her position. Ditto the senior IT management. And definitely anyone and everyone who signed off the stages of that contract.
$19m contract, nice work guys. I wish i could get a $24m contract for proven incompetence, that way when they pay me for our $29m contract, it would be taxpayer money well spent, coming in just under our $35m budget.
*Checks if it’s a Betoota article*
It’s not…….
Accenture? Definitely made in India.
Come to think of it… that’s quite the hefty sum for an offshore development
Fucking gov handing out cash to firms like Accenture and Deloitte to deliver software projects, it is mad.
I don’t know anything about website development but for 16 mill I could probably get it done better.
Only in Australia is incompetence rewarded.
I knew without clicking that Accenture had landed the deal. Good lord.
Why not give other quality shovelware companies like Wipro and InfoSys a go? /s
[reg.bom.gov.au](http://reg.bom.gov.au)
Thank me later
Wouldn’t it be nice if we actually had a functioning federal ICAC.
Accenture. Guaranteed to be another cluster fuck.
Government tender efficiency in action!
Accenture: we convince your moron upper management that AI will solve all of their problems when we don’t even understand their problem set.
Accenture built exactly what they were contracted to build, and the total contract wasn’t just for a website, but don’t let facts get in the way of a good story
So which higher up has a mate that runs Accenture?