“NATO’S DISGRACED LAPDOG” – EX-MINISTER OF ROMANIA MIRCEA GEOANĂ CAUGHT IN A WEB OF RUSSIAN CASH, KREMLIN TIES

hodorkovski “disident” 😉

https://preview.redd.it/0b9kdljykkrg1.png?width=753&format=png&auto=webp&s=efc283ac85b7cfb58dd00ffe1ff31078508d8261

Cineva a plătit sa dea in Geoană:)))

Cine ar fi crezut ca urmasii comunistilor romani ar avea legatura cu Rusia

L-a crescut bine Iliescu

A citit careva articolul din fituica aia de 3 lei online?
E atac la persoana.
Analiza pe text si apoi AI pe text:

“a man who has actively campaigned for the Kremlin’s brutal war effort in Ukraine” – fals…

“it is the documented reality of the political filth that Geoană surrounds himself with” – “noi nu mintim nimic, doar punem etichete fara dovezi”

“In an act of stunning cowardice, he falsely accused Attila Biro, the head of Context.ro” – deci vendeta intre baieti si el… se supara ca el s-a suparat ca a fost facut albie de porci de ei

“Mircea Geoană’s Campaign Manager’s Son Did Business with the Oligarch ” – deci fiul managerului de campanie a lui Geoana ar fi facut “afaceri” cu un oligarh. Cand?! Ce “afaceri”? Nimic..

Deci care este “legatura”?
Ca Fiul sefului de campanie electorala a lui Geoana ar fi avut “legaturi de afaceri” cu un oligarh rus!

Acum ce zice AI-ul:
I’ve confirmed one important point already: the credible 2024 reporting was about a campaign coordinator’s business link to a Russian propagandist, not proof that Geoană himself took “Russian cash.”

I’ve got the core mismatch now: the underlying 2024 investigation described links involving Rareș Mănescu and his business associates, while the LuxHerald piece turns that into “Geoană caught in Russian cash/Kremlin ties.” That jump is not supported by the reporting I could verify.

I couldn’t load that LuxHerald page directly because the site was returning a 520 error, so I checked the indexed snippets for that exact article and compared them with the underlying reporting it appears to rely on. On that basis, the article’s core accusation is not supported.

The article is also packaged as if it were a fresh 2026 revelation, but the reporting it points back to was published in October 2024. So it is largely a reheated scandal with harsher wording, not new evidence.

The publisher itself shows credibility problems. The homepage text exposes no clear masthead/editorial explanation in the fetched content, only a generic contact email and an outdated footer (“2013-2016”), while the Geoană headline uses openly abusive language (“Disgraced Lapdog”), which is a propaganda style rather than normal investigative reporting.

So the clean conclusion is this: there was a real 2024 story about a Geoană associate’s Russian-linked business connections, but LuxHerald inflates that into a direct allegation that Geoană himself was tied to Russian money/Kremlin networks. That stronger claim is the false or at least unsupported part. For context, Geoană’s actual NATO role was Deputy Secretary General from 2019 to 2024.

Am folosit ChatGPT 5.4 Thinking Extended.

Acuma sa ne lamurim. Daca voi credeti ca un Secretar NATO nu este urmarit si cand se pisa de servicii nationale si internationale si ca daca se miroase ceva nu e matrasit in piata publica sunteti naivi.

Niveul de acreditare publica a lui Geoana este enorm. Nu cred ca exista un politician mai “scormonit” de servicii decat asta.

Ooopsss

cyka blyat rush B

Nu știu de LuxHerald asta, dar de [Context.ro am auzit](https://context.ro/serial/geoana-si-rusii/)

Am invins (iar) Mihaela!!!

Oh no: Geoana e pro-Rus… nu as fi zis… incredibil. Eu credeam ca are și naționalitate sincer