Is the Supreme Court supposed to be unpredictable?
iamacheeto1 on
Shouldn’t court proceedings be very, very predictable?
frommethodtomadness on
They’re way too corrupt, far Right extremist, and most of it’s members are illegitimate. The Court needs to be completely reformed, increased by at least 20 Justices, and the shadow docket needs to be outlawed.
ChiBeerGuy on
The only people that think the Supreme Court isn’t political, is the Supreme Court.
He_made_an_attempt on
Age limits. For all govt positions. Now!!
BrainLate4108 on
Don’t need AI to predict moves of a fascist kangaroo court.
Ehgadsman on
for fucks sake lady this isn’t a contest for originality its a fight for democracy
luchtverfrissert on
Let’s make it a wheel of fortune
terrymr on
The legal system is supposed to be predictable, that’s how it works.
Perfecshionism on
They should be predictable.
It just should not be predictable along party lines.
Suspicious_Safe7647 on
Didn’t they make a movie about this with Chris Pratt?
A Judge has to be -Impartial- which means at times they have to be unpredictable.
This sounds like a way for the tech bro dipshits to create yet another gambling scam. Can old politicians stop falling for this garbage? There’s a bunch of 20/30 year olds out there who have stolen millions from the working class thanks to this.
Don’t reward idiocy.
africanlivedit on
Still insane to me we can’t actually see the court in session via CSPAN.
imaginary_num6er on
AI can replace Al(ito)
Indigoh on
The law should be predictable, actually.
TheShipEliza on
Most of my life you can count on them fabricating fascist bullshit. It has been an issue for 100 years
prof_dr_mr_obvious on
The Supreme Court should be predictable. The erratic, non sensical, partizan, corrupt shite we have seen the past years are *the problem*.
onyxlabyrinth1979 on
It feels less like an AI problem and more like a transparency one. If decisions follow consistent patterns, models will pick that up. The uncomfortable part is seeing it quantified.
The question is whether that predictability is fairness and stability, or something that can be gamed once it’s obvious.
justintimeformine on
“partisan”
Stare decisis… While I’ll never.
yuusharo on
Hey maybe the most powerful court in the country should he predictable.
Just a thought.
123-Moondance on
Decisions should be predictable. You (should) follow the law. That is it. Nothing more.
sceadwian on
Predicting which way the vote goes isn’t important without detailed analysis of the exact decision implications which AI can’t do.
Equivalent_Track_133 on
Is that a bad thing? Shouldn’t the law be reliable and predictable?
fknzxlegend13 on
Is this the first case of someone that’s in a relatively “untouchable” position feeling threatened by AI the same way regular folk have been feeling? Wow
Hypnotist30 on
Are they worried about AI taking their jobs?
Travelerdude on
I guess that when Roberts retires, he will be replaced by Robot instead.
Refrigeratormarathon on
She’s saying that the cases selected are obvious partisan performances that defeat the purpose of the branch. The Supreme Court was created to grapple with nuanced issues so complex that previous courts couldn’t conclude the case. Judges were never meant to follow a party line, and cases were never meant to be partisan, which is why the outcomes shouldn’t be this predictable.
26 Comments
Is the Supreme Court supposed to be unpredictable?
Shouldn’t court proceedings be very, very predictable?
They’re way too corrupt, far Right extremist, and most of it’s members are illegitimate. The Court needs to be completely reformed, increased by at least 20 Justices, and the shadow docket needs to be outlawed.
The only people that think the Supreme Court isn’t political, is the Supreme Court.
Age limits. For all govt positions. Now!!
Don’t need AI to predict moves of a fascist kangaroo court.
for fucks sake lady this isn’t a contest for originality its a fight for democracy
Let’s make it a wheel of fortune
The legal system is supposed to be predictable, that’s how it works.
They should be predictable.
It just should not be predictable along party lines.
Didn’t they make a movie about this with Chris Pratt?
A Judge has to be -Impartial- which means at times they have to be unpredictable.
This sounds like a way for the tech bro dipshits to create yet another gambling scam. Can old politicians stop falling for this garbage? There’s a bunch of 20/30 year olds out there who have stolen millions from the working class thanks to this.
Don’t reward idiocy.
Still insane to me we can’t actually see the court in session via CSPAN.
AI can replace Al(ito)
The law should be predictable, actually.
Most of my life you can count on them fabricating fascist bullshit. It has been an issue for 100 years
The Supreme Court should be predictable. The erratic, non sensical, partizan, corrupt shite we have seen the past years are *the problem*.
It feels less like an AI problem and more like a transparency one. If decisions follow consistent patterns, models will pick that up. The uncomfortable part is seeing it quantified.
The question is whether that predictability is fairness and stability, or something that can be gamed once it’s obvious.
“partisan”
Stare decisis… While I’ll never.
Hey maybe the most powerful court in the country should he predictable.
Just a thought.
Decisions should be predictable. You (should) follow the law. That is it. Nothing more.
Predicting which way the vote goes isn’t important without detailed analysis of the exact decision implications which AI can’t do.
Is that a bad thing? Shouldn’t the law be reliable and predictable?
Is this the first case of someone that’s in a relatively “untouchable” position feeling threatened by AI the same way regular folk have been feeling? Wow
Are they worried about AI taking their jobs?
I guess that when Roberts retires, he will be replaced by Robot instead.
She’s saying that the cases selected are obvious partisan performances that defeat the purpose of the branch. The Supreme Court was created to grapple with nuanced issues so complex that previous courts couldn’t conclude the case. Judges were never meant to follow a party line, and cases were never meant to be partisan, which is why the outcomes shouldn’t be this predictable.