45 Comments

  1. I don’t understand the proportions at all. Can’t say it’s intuitive or beautiful, although the concept is interesting

  2. I would put the names of the buildings on/next to the timeline as well. It is hard to match the names left buildings to the right

  3. Not sure how people aren’t understanding this graphic, I think they’re both really clear and easy to understand.

    It is missing 40 Wall Street in between Woolworth & Chrysler though.

  4. One look and this is indeed nonsense, Shanghai Tower and Guangzhou CTF aren’t there

  5. Why were so many European cathedrals suddenly increasing their height in the late 1800s?

  6. ottawalanguages on

    really cool work! although I think the bar on the right and the connecting lines to the bar on the right are not needed … a simple time axis would suffice!

  7. Dennyisthepisslord on

    This is The great pyramid and Lincoln cathedral erasure simply because they would break the chart isn’t it

  8. grain_farmer on

    I feel like this is some kind of smear campaign against Lincoln Cathedral, the tallest building in the world for 200 years, breaking the 3,800 year streak of Egypt.

    I think we can all agree overall Africa is still in the lead in terms of cumulative years.

  9. It’s refreshing to see this sub being used for its original purpose instead of spamming political propaganda in the form of graphs.

  10. OMG I’m so sorry you posted this. Now Trump will want to spend $20 billion of taxpayer dollars to build “The World’s Tallest Building” that will be one foot taller than the Burj Khalifa.

  11. ICanGetLoudTooWTF on

    Now *this* is beautiful data, unlike most of the stuff that makes it to the top of this sub!

  12. I knew the Burj Khalifa was tall, but I didnt realize how much taller than any American buildings it was.

  13. Why was the St. Marien Church in Stralsund, Germany not considered? It was 151 m from 1549 until 1647.

  14. Could we stop counting spires that are not usable floors? The highest floor is a way better measurement of the highest building. The burj khalifa has a 240m spire on top that isn’t actually useful.

  15. mickeysbestbud on

    This is a really weird way to represent this data. I get what it is saying, but when I see a bar chart like this I think of them adding or compounding to each other. These are buildings, they aren’t built on top of one another getting taller. I’d rather see building heights compared to each other, not summed.

  16. Where is africa? I just read that Morocco inaugurated a 250m tower and its only the 3rd tallest building in africa.

  17. Frustrated9876 on

    The only problem is that there’s a bunch of buildings missing? Where’s the Wilshire Grand (335m) or the sales force tower (326m)?

  18. hanzoplsswitch on

    Imaging as a village peasant in 1650 going to Strassbourg and seeing the cathedral for the first time.

  19. Gotta be careful about the definition of ‘building’.

    By some definitions, the CN Tower takes over in 1976 at 553m, displacing Sears Tower, and neither Petronas Towers or Taipei 101 would be on the chart. The data source doesn’t include a definition of building at all.

  20. This would be so much better with time on the horizontal axis and height on the vertical

  21. Now I want to see when the construction started / finished to visualize the race to the top.

  22. darthy_parker on

    Maybe the world’s tallest freestanding structure should get an asterisk mention: CN Tower, 1976 – 2010, 553 m

  23. Mr_Wrecksauce on

    Would 2 World Trade Center be just behind 1WTC and taller than the Empire State Building? There was only a 6 ft difference between the two.

  24. bowsmountainer on

    This graph is incorrect.

    The Eiffel tower was built in 1889 and at 330m tall it was the tallest building for several decades.

  25. Froggy_Parker on

    Really cool visual, did you try doing time on an x axis? Might be too busy without a scroll bar or a play button.