The article: https://nltimes.nl/2026/04/20/govt-considering-temporary-cut-public-transport-fares-high-fuel-prices

    “The Dutch Cabinet is considering a temporary fare reduction for public transport as one of the measures to help citizens cope with higher fuel and energy prices due to the Iran war, sources close to the government told the Telegraaf. The Cabinet will present a package of measures intended to protect people’s purchasing power at 11:30 a.m. The National Oil Crisis Plan also takes effect today.”

    Hopefully Belgium will do the same: “Dutch government considering cuts to public transport cost in response to energy crisis”
    byu/Quiet_Illustrator410 inbelgium



    Posted by Quiet_Illustrator410

    Share.

    26 Comments

    1. silverionmox on

      No, the Flemish government will instead force civil servants to physically come to the office more often.

    2. No let us not hope they do this.
      Let us hope instead they stop trying to privatise the public transport and realise that the governement should be a service provider

    3. I really don’t believe fare price is the prohibitive factor in Belgium for people to use public transport instead of a car.

    4. Unfortunately that will never happen under a NVA government/minister of mobility. If anything they will somehow spin this as an excuse to cut our public transport’s budget even further

    5. A lot of people don’t have decent access to public transport. I doubt this will make many people suddenly use public transport.

      So the effect would be a discount for the people that already dont use oil.

      Nothing is free. So that would come from taxes. Resulting in either lower quality in other government responsibilities(lower pensions?) or higher taxes.

    6. Yeah, now would be a great time to restructure the wage-cost (both for employers and employees)by removing this idiotic idea of the company car as one of the few viable ways for a employers to raise an employees wage without raising the taxed level too much.

      Hopefully in a coherent and well-thaught-out- way (it is belgium so its level impossible). And reinvest in the degrading public transport.

      Just my opinion i suppose.

    7. You may hope, but expect nothing. De Wever giving “handouts” to “the poor”?

    8. Our problem is mostly with coverage. Adding busses and train lines would help but you can’t invent cars and drivers out of thin air in weeks. 

    9. I’m in Tasmania now and public transport is free here. I was surprised how quickly they implemented it. 

    10. Klutzy_Hovercraft173 on

      There are so many stupid rules they could stop to support and encourage solar energy,

    11. Least_Funny5960 on

      Unpopular opinion:

      I hope the Flemish government does **not** do this, and the reason is very simple: the Flemish government ever since NVA took a dominant position in the government in 2014 has been actively working every step of the way to dismantle De Lijn piece by piece.

      It first started with consistent budget cuts (after accounting for inflation). Then it continued with opening the door to having private companies operating certain bus lines. Then we got this new definition of “basisbereikbaarheid” which completely gutted the need for providing bus service in more rural areas and had it switch entirely to an on demand system which only works if you’re retired and have all day to schedule your trips around the inconsistency of the on demand system.

      And when people who work for De Lijn complained about all of this that it made their job increasingly impossible, the Flemish government responded with

      >Private companies don’t complain, they find solutions. We recommend De Lijn also focuses on finding solutions instead of complaining otherwise we might have to look into having the system privatized entirely

      Cutting fairs now will not lead to a compensation from the Flemish government whatsoever, they’ll just use this as the next step in their “starve the beast” strategy of De Lijn so that they eventually can point and say “it doesn’t work, privatize it”.

      I feel for people who are struggling due to the energy crisis, but cutting public transit costs at this moment will only mean our public transit will struggle even more than it already is and in the long term will be incredibly detrimental. It would have ramifications long beyond this current temporary crisis.

    12. BrokenHefaistos on

      Do we still have any decent public transport all Anick De Ridder does is cut budgets so companies keep getting wage tax reductions for paying wage with company cars.
      If public transport is decent most people would refuse those.

    13. adappergentlefolk on

      we do not need to subsidise energy. there is no money for it and it doesn’t work, basic economic research shows this

    14. flyingabroom on

      Good idea but I think lowering taxes on millionaires and large business owners is a much better idea. Maybe throw in something for those poor second and third homeowners too.

    15. This money would be far better spent IMPROVING public transport rather than making the existing offer more affordable – which, when you look at our neighbours, it absolutely already is. SNCB could use a Belgium-wide ticket but that’s not exactly about commuting.

      We need public transport that’s more reliable and more often. And yes as others have said, we could cut the company cars and use that money too, now’s the perfect moment

    16. Beaver987123 on

      We did that once during Covid. Everyone could receive a “free” 10-rittenkaart and it was horrible. People ended up never using them or only used them for day trips instead of going to work (while those people have a subscription most of the time). There were also other limitations. It was a horrible use of tax payer money.

    17. > government considering cuts to public transport ~~cost~~ in response to energy crisis

      There you go. I’ve got the Flemish government version.

    18. The price of public transport in NL is much higher than in Belgium, so they’ve got much more margin to lower some prices. Which they should have done years ago already