So I’m a learner and came across this bridge. (There is no traffic light there currently). I know the other side has the right of way I so approach the line slowly and I see no one at the other side of the tunnel so I’m already entering the tunnel but as I do I see a car coming in from the other side he doesn’t stop but instead speeds up towards me when he sees me and I have to back up to to let him go first. Can he do that? Am I in the wrong? What am I supposed to do when things like this happen on my exam?
https://i.redd.it/zejk8ndwqcwg1.png
Posted by fsociety19
15 Comments
Is this in Herent, near Leuven?
once you’re in the tunnel, he should stop. but if it’s a nutcase like you describe, it’s better to back out, because insurance companies will look at the advantage rule
No lines on the ground ? I would assume you have the right of way because the road is narrowed on the your opposite side.
The priority is always for the first one to enter on the intersection/ bridge / tunnel. The priority rules only apply before entering, if there is someone else approaching.
If there was no one, you can enter and then you have the priority
The fact that he speeds up when he sees you’re already inside the tunnel should already be enough to determine who is the idiot.
This tunnel specifically is somewhat of a joke locally. Every year there are multiple vehicles that get stuck and everytime again the commune does something insufficient to try to solve the issue. Electric lights and chain before the tunnel to avert drivers seem logicql but apparently not feasible…
He is in the wrong as you have the right of way due to already being there. In life, there are many idiots so although rules say you have the right of way and should not give way(if it’s an exam question), the safest option in the situation is to give way.
Experienced drivers could potentially double down and speed up themselves if they trust they can avoid a collision to force the other side to back down as well, but that is also reckless driving and trusting that the other person isn’t under influence, so don’t.
The most legal way to handle this without giving way is to keep driving until you no longer safely can aka stop in front of them and refuse to back down. It might waste more time than backing down and could escalate to a fight if the other side is a retard.
Evaluate the situation accordingly and follow the rules, but most importantly, drive safely
I drove through there yesterday and yes it’s stupid that they removed the traffic lights. Due to the incline you cannot see if someone is approaching from the other side.
Reading your story the other car should have waited, but some people just lack respect when driving.
Also unrelated. A lot of vans have gotten stuck under that bridge it’s full of scratches on the ceiling. It happens pretty often.
This road is only for lorries 😄
dashcam
The other driver was probably a BMW.
I second the others. It’s the same rule as when you are going around an obstacle such as parked cars.
If you can stop safely and let them through, you do so. Like if there’s a hole between the cars, or in this case before the tunnel.
If you cannot stop safely or let them through, then they have to wait, possibly back out. They are supposed to check the way is clear prior to entering the problematic zone.
Do note that with a vehicle like the one in the picture, I’d refuse to back up, in case there’d be a cyclist or a child behind the vehicle.
Oh, I live near this place. I didn’t even know they removed the traffic light…
Once you decide to go, it needs to be free
Once you are inside AND THEN a car jumps out of nowhere, you are in the right since there is no way to give them priority
So: in exam it should be clear, in practice it’s word against word and the best argumentation wins
in de buurt waar ik woon, verlies je de voorrang zodra je oogcontact maakt. … Had je oogcontact met de andere weggebruiker?