Share.

25 Comments

  1. EagleReloaded on

    I don’t know why we can’t follow the European approach where the store name must follow the design aesthetic of the building.

  2. The shit these companies get away with is infuriating. A citizen that tries to change a gutter colour on a house in a heritage conservation area, should apply for permit. Spoiler alert: bright red won’t pass the approval.
    I do hope council gets back and makes them change the awning. Far out

  3. Why people in this photo are dressed in black?
    are we going full Melbourne mode!? 😜😄

  4. Educational-Sort-128 on

    The lucky barristers at Frederick
    Jordan chambers just got dinner sorted.

  5. Repurposed_Juice on

    Still looks a hell of a lot better than the brutalist crud that passes for architecture.

  6. diagonalcloud on

    Agree. Deserves better and got better.

    The burgers are better at Hungry Jacks.

  7. Looks pretty lowkey to me, id rather have functional buildings than empty derelict building “heritage” protected like the homebush theatre

  8. AdAccomplished8853 on

    I sort of like it when Take Away chains are housed in impressive architecture. It makes people pay attention to the building, it stands out and is unique and you have a reason to visit and go inside.

  9. butter_wizard on

    That used to be a St George bank with the full bright green and red signage. Did that bother you too?

  10. If they bring back the rock & roll theme interiors then it may be salvageable 😅