Countries with larger active military personnel than the United Kingdom, 1900 vs 2026

Posted by vladgrinch

27 Comments

  1. Necessary-Product361 on

    Who would have thought that we needed a larger army when we owned a quarter of the earth compared to now?

  2. Tyrannical-Botanical on

    Back when we used to actually demobilize and shrink the military after a conflict.

  3. Solid-Move-1411 on

    Largest Armies in 1913:

    |**Rank** |**Country**|**Active Personnel (Est.)**|
    |:-|:-|:-|
    |1|**Russian Empire**|~1,300,000|
    |2|**German Empire**|~800,000|
    |3|**France**|~750,000|
    |4|**Austro-Hungarian Empire**|~450,000|
    |5|**Italy**|~300,000|
    |6|**Ottoman Empire**|~250,000|
    |7|**British Empire**|~250,000|
    |8|**Japan**|~230,000|
    |9|**Spain**|~140,000|
    |10|**United States**|~95,000|

  4. PhileasFoggsTrvlAgt on

    How many of the red countries were controlled by the British Empire in 1900?

  5. midnightmoose on

    Active soldiers is a very limited understanding of “larger millitary” when you don’t factor in nuclear warheads, aircraft carriers and submarines.

  6. It’s 2026… a million men are useless when technological superiority is far more decisive.

    For example, the Mexican army is a joke.

    And Morocco has more soldiers than Spain, but it could never win a war against Spain.

  7. The UK is still stronger than all but 5 of the countries shaded in red on the below map, and all of the countries in grey.

  8. yIdontunderstand on

    1900 was peak British empire, the largest empire the world has ever seen….

    So if that is a surprise that the military was big….

  9. AceOfSpades532 on

    Did France really have a larger military than the close to peak British Empire?

  10. AcidaliaPlanitia on

    Whoa, the Moroccan Army is a lot bigger than I ever would have expected. If Wikipedia numbers are to be believed, 1% of the population is active duty Army.

  11. Sufficient_Laugh9012 on

    “Larger” as in physical size of personnel? Weight, height, lime consumption, or average waistline?

  12. The UK doesn’t need armed forces it had in 1900, nor does it really need even large ones. It is an island bordering absolutely 0 hostile nations, or nations that would/could pose a threat.

  13. I’m skeptical of this map. The Qing Dynasty was in a decline in 1900 and European Powers and Japan had already began partioning zones of control within China.

  14. Exact_Accident_2343 on

    wtf kinda military does Iraq have rn to suggest it’s “bigger” than the UK’s man what the heck, a huge proportion of its soldiers take orders from Iran before they do from Iraq in the first place

  15. How can Japan have a larger military? They’re legally forbidden from having a military

  16. Numbers are not the full story, even then some smaller militaries would arguably have a very strong fight against the British in quality, competence and functional state, the Royal navy is in a deep sorry state.

  17. TraditionTurbulent39 on

    Ironically, some of the countries in red on the bottom map were under British rule in 1900.