28 Comments

  1. DingusMcBingle_IV on

    “Experts say”

    Experts say eggs are bad. No wait, they say eggs are good. No they’re bad again. Eggs good. Eggs bad. Good. Bad.

  2. My question being, how much of this interest translate into actual moves? Intent and feelings are not the lone motivators.

  3. morelsupporter on

    and then they realize the cost of living is high, the wages are low and they say “meh, what’s a couple more years of trump”

  4. mustardman73 on

    Tin foil alert. Is it because of all the sudden deaths of many scientists in the USA?

  5. broadviewstation on

    What kid if academia ? If it’s researches and scientists sure we don’t need more social scientists and acedemic grifters

  6. DeepSpaceNebulae on

    Look at that, yet another r/Canada post that has 20 identical complaining comments within 10 minutes of posting

  7. AlvinChipmunck on

    You mean those academics that werent able to get a tenured position in an american university? Sounds about right

  8. Oh my, what a confused article.

    * The quoted academics are (not kidding) a “fascism researcher” and a “philosophy professor”. Nobody actually useful for innovation, science or the economy.
    * The goal is of the program (per the article) is to attract experts in “*health care, clean technology and artificial intelligence*.” Not really the same thing.
    * Meanwhile, “academic freedom” is mentioned four times, but Canada has significantly *less* of that, and of freedom-of-speech, than the U.S., where it’s a Constitutional Right. In Canada, there’s an actual phrase for *preventing* freedom of speech, the “Chilling Effect”, especially using “human rights complaints”. As they say, the process *is* the punishment.

    Wake me up when it’s physicists and real medical scientists making the move.

  9. InvictusShmictus on

    “Columbia University paid the U.S. government a $200 million settlement after the Trump administration accused the university of failing to properly address antisemitism on campus during protest encampments against the Israel-Hamas war.”

    The poor repressed academics.

  10. I think the US doesn’t value the low level academics any more. They’ve clued in that they’ve caused way more trouble than they’re worth with their awful ideas on our culture, so they need to go somewhere still accepting to the grift.

  11. A good thing if it’s academics studying useful science, not necessarily great if it’s just more publicly funded academics with pointless research areas.

  12. >“That’s the only reason. Nobody’s coming to Canada for higher wages because you’re not getting higher wages. You’re getting lower retirement, lower salaries, sometimes more teaching. So it’s academic freedom,” Stanley said in an interview with The Canadian Press.

    He may regret this decision in a year or two.

    Plus, how many in Professor openings can Canada really create?

  13. slumlordscanstarve on

    If you voted for peachfuzz you are not welcomed here.

    Canada has many academics and researchers. Let’s look to promote from within before importing more people please.

  14. CaptaineJack on

    That’s going to be 50 people out of a population of 40 million. 

    Impact is massively overstated and they’ll be back in the US as soon as the government changes. 

    Politically driven lateral moves never hold. 

  15. Ok-Builder-9338 on

    So their acadamics are coming up here, while our skilled workers and young people are going down there. Wonder if that’ll even out

  16. Does this mean we have to properly fund our education system to bring in qualified academics to our universities?

  17. Content-Inspector993 on

    I expect a lot of this new American interest in Canada to die down if the midterms go the way of the democrats

  18. awildstoryteller on

    The number of comments here suggesting that the social sciences is not a worthwhile field is somewhat depressing.

    Knowledge is important, and universities are not simply factories to churn out calculators and slide rules in human form.