If Trump runs again for a 3rd term.. so can Obama and Obama would destroy him.
LordNemissary on
If you think logic will save you from fascism then I have a bridge to sell you
HazeHQ on
Can’t be tried for treason.. when you haven’t committed treason
ShiftIntelligent8729 on
this is some next-level irony, bro. always wild when the rules change depending on who’s in charge.
Utterlybored on
Democrats get a carve out.
tazztsim on
Of course he also didn’t do anything treasonous.
Bubbaganewsh on
No no no, the immunity only applies to bloated sacks of shit of course, SCOTUS only made their overlord immune. /s
NeverLookBothWays on
Correction: They gave Republicans immunity.
They took away the immunity of any Democrat holding office, effectively, for the same crime. As the wording of the enabling ruling they made keeps the definition of an “official act” vague enough to where the case would always get kicked back to the Supreme Court.
That July was a soft coup. And they got away with it because we allowed it.
Muffboy on
Now do child rape
myReddltId on
He is good at distracting people and always giving them something to talk about so people don’t ask real questions
TheLuo on
SCOTUS gave sitting presidents immunity from prosecution. You can absolutely charge presidents with crimes they committed in office, after they leave office.
Thats entirely how trump was convicted between his 1st and 2nd term.
So as it stands, if a sitting president commits a crime you must impeach, THEN charge them.
SippinOnHatorade on
That’s what you think..
arjunusmaximus on
Can’t they just create a bogus reason? Like the other day when they were going that he violated the Logan Act or something
bit-by-a-moose on
Do you really think hypocrisy gives republicans pause?
Here’s the thing, they gave “official” acts immunity.
And people have allowed them to define what is official without any push back.
meatball402 on
No, the scotus made “official acts” above the law, and that they get to decide what counts as an official act.
That way, Republicans get immunity, dems get treason charges. Still waiting to hear what the dem plan is about this, because right now it seems “become a small opposition party” is the plan.
Da_Stable_Genius on
For some reason I think the SCOTUS would change their mind on this “ruling” if given the chance.
ndndr1 on
More importantly has done nothing treasonous
save-aiur on
Trump has Obama Derangement Syndrome
MyLifeOfficial on
I believe the immunity only applies to any duties and actions that the president is permitted to take while being President.
I’m unsure whether it extends to things which may be factually illegal for a President to do. Correct me if I’m wrong.
GhostofAugustWest on
Zero chance Thomas, Roberts and Alito would apply the same rules to Obama.
graphicsRat on

Think about it
DiotCoke on
I’m sure the supreme court can find the logic for a carve out for black presidents
TributaryOtis on
The fact that SCOTUS gets to decide what’s an official act that gets immunity is why I advocated for Biden to send the six conservative justices to Guantanamo. Can’t rule that it wasn’t an official act from there.
dover_oxide on
I swear that ruling is the worst one any SC ever made.
roybum46 on
Yes… But Roe v. Wade and Purcell v. Gonzalez.
CelticDK on
Give it a year and it’ll be rolled back to just Trump or republican presidents
Possible_Beautiful63 on

MaybeTheDoctor on
Actually please do start legal procedures because it will invalidate the scotus ruling for when it’s trumps turn
mybotanyaccount on
And all for roasting Trump!
Didn’t know hurting someone’s feelings was considered treason
32 Comments
If Trump runs again for a 3rd term.. so can Obama and Obama would destroy him.
If you think logic will save you from fascism then I have a bridge to sell you
Can’t be tried for treason.. when you haven’t committed treason
this is some next-level irony, bro. always wild when the rules change depending on who’s in charge.
Democrats get a carve out.
Of course he also didn’t do anything treasonous.
No no no, the immunity only applies to bloated sacks of shit of course, SCOTUS only made their overlord immune. /s
Correction: They gave Republicans immunity.
They took away the immunity of any Democrat holding office, effectively, for the same crime. As the wording of the enabling ruling they made keeps the definition of an “official act” vague enough to where the case would always get kicked back to the Supreme Court.
That July was a soft coup. And they got away with it because we allowed it.
Now do child rape
He is good at distracting people and always giving them something to talk about so people don’t ask real questions
SCOTUS gave sitting presidents immunity from prosecution. You can absolutely charge presidents with crimes they committed in office, after they leave office.
Thats entirely how trump was convicted between his 1st and 2nd term.
So as it stands, if a sitting president commits a crime you must impeach, THEN charge them.
That’s what you think..
Can’t they just create a bogus reason? Like the other day when they were going that he violated the Logan Act or something
Do you really think hypocrisy gives republicans pause?
Here’s the thing, they gave “official” acts immunity.
And people have allowed them to define what is official without any push back.
No, the scotus made “official acts” above the law, and that they get to decide what counts as an official act.
That way, Republicans get immunity, dems get treason charges. Still waiting to hear what the dem plan is about this, because right now it seems “become a small opposition party” is the plan.
For some reason I think the SCOTUS would change their mind on this “ruling” if given the chance.
More importantly has done nothing treasonous
Trump has Obama Derangement Syndrome
I believe the immunity only applies to any duties and actions that the president is permitted to take while being President.
I’m unsure whether it extends to things which may be factually illegal for a President to do. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Zero chance Thomas, Roberts and Alito would apply the same rules to Obama.

Think about it
I’m sure the supreme court can find the logic for a carve out for black presidents
The fact that SCOTUS gets to decide what’s an official act that gets immunity is why I advocated for Biden to send the six conservative justices to Guantanamo. Can’t rule that it wasn’t an official act from there.
I swear that ruling is the worst one any SC ever made.
Yes… But Roe v. Wade and Purcell v. Gonzalez.
Give it a year and it’ll be rolled back to just Trump or republican presidents

Actually please do start legal procedures because it will invalidate the scotus ruling for when it’s trumps turn
And all for roasting Trump!
Didn’t know hurting someone’s feelings was considered treason
https://preview.redd.it/bwzneevopp0h1.jpeg?width=912&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fa6ba16d9390e45920d0d0d2edca9e9ff34d18df
Scotus more like Scrotus
Retroactive immunity