Close Menu
    Utah residents push back after Kevin O’Leary’s data center plan turns out to be 40,000 acres, not 40,000 square feet
    Croatia

    Utah residents push back after Kevin O’Leary’s data center plan turns out to be 40,000 acres, not 40,000 square feet


    What are your arguments for building and arguments for not building Pantheon?

    From everything I’ve read so far, I kind of think we’re going to do more harm than good with this. Damage in terms of market opening, where we will be fertile ground for such investments where I do not see any direct income (these are self-sustaining facilities that, when put into operation, do not need human resources/staff). Environmental damage (heating and cooling of the facility), loud operation of the data center. But again, that’s my unprofessional opinion, based on what I’ve read, not expert arguments.

    https://v.redd.it/bjwhdonrji0h1

    Posted by BIIPD

    Share.
    View 5 Comments

    5 Comments

    1. Severe-Height-4857 on

      Mislim da je bilo pametnijih stvari za (cross) postat za podržavanje vlastitog stajališta. Nikoga ovdje nije briga ni tko je Kevin O’Leary ni na koliko kvadrata je neki centar u jebenoj Uti.

    3. Delator_bez_pokrica on

      Ne brini se, izgraditi ce se u drugim dijelovima svijeta pa ce se kasnije plakati – “ZaR I ToKEne MOraMo UvOziTi”.

      Svakako da treba sprijeciti negativne eksteranlije, ali normalna drzava valjda moze provoditi ekoloske zakone ili glasati za politicku opciju koja hoce.

    4. Nervous_Lettuce313 on

      Doslovno nikakvu korist nemamo od toga. Nit će zaposlit ljude nit će doprinijeti ikako državi (osim ušupkavanja), a trošit će struju i vodu kao pola Hrvatske. Uopće ne kužim kako misle predstaviti to kao nešto pozitivno.