Share.

    20 Comments

    1. >According to the officials, all of whom requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, the “new arrangement” would grant Jews “equal access” to the Muslim site and formally allow large-group Jewish prayer.

      Imagine thinking it’s controversial for Jews to ask for equal rights at a site central to Judaism.

    2. Bigmoochcooch on

      I already know how this is gonna go…..both the muslims and Jews will fight each other. The right wing religious Jewish people want the dome of the rock and alaqsa mosque gone for the Beit Hamikdash

    3. If the UN was worth something then that site would be UN-managed and open to all.

    4. DDoubleDDog on

      I’m not buying this. It’s all based on anonymous sources. It seems like fake news designed to create division.

    5. Honestly, they shouldn’t have it at all. The only reason Jordan has that ‘custodian’ status at all is because they illegally occupied Jerusalem in the wake of the 1948 war. That occupation also marked the only time the Jewish population had ever been totally removed from the Old City in all its history… not even the Romans pulled that off.

    6. mr_birkenblatt on

      *Israel waving a stack of papers while US to strip Jordan of Al-Aqsa custodianship

    7. The_Ugliest_Man_Ever on

      The worst possible people are the only ones who get to celebrate anything anymore.

    8. Imaginary-Relief-236 on

      I got a weird feeling they want to hand it over to the Saudis as an incentive to normalise relations