Share.

    10 Comments

    1. WolverineTemporary49 on

      Fair question, and it’s the key thing the data rules out. Two reasons it’s not luck: (1) On the 23 Year-in-Search markets he won 22 — and he won them by betting against the obvious favorites (NO on Trump/Pope/Censori) at high prices, then YES on an unknown at 3¢. That’s not picking winners, that’s knowing the answer. (2) The same wallet lost money on everything else it traded (−13.5% ROI, ~55% win rate). Luck doesn’t switch off the moment you leave one specific category. The DOJ independently charged him, which confirms the read.

    2. Chemical_Winner_1084 on

      Didn’t a US special forces ranger get caught doing this exact same thing on missions?

    3. TheTresStateArea on

      First off these markets should be banned.

      Second off, you have to aim for 50% win rate and eek out the win in the high value bets.

      The insider was an idiot.

    4. Specialist-Waltz9992 on

      He’s been charged by the DOJ and CFTC (May 2026) — wire fraud, money laundering, and Commodity Exchange Act violations, up to 50 years max combined (charged, not convicted). Google put him on leave. I’m not a lawyer, but in these cases the profits are typically targeted for forfeiture/disgorgement. The notable part for this sub: the prosecution needed Google’s internal records to prove intent, but the trading footprint — every bet, timestamp, and payout — was sitting in public on-chain the whole time. The crime was visible before anyone went looking.