Here’s a dumb question: Isn’t this costing the city advertising revenue?
I went out yesterday and saw that nearly every bus stop along the riverbank had been completely covered by three fliers related to the Russian foreign agent law.
Considering that two of the fliers are identical to a graphic that GD politicians have shared on social media, I would say it is a safe bet that government money was used to pay people to put up these fliers.
Here’s the odd thing: they completely, and absurdly, covered bus kiosks that used to feature advertising. It will cost a fortune to clean these up, and I wouldn’t see any advertising firms spending money unless and until these have been completely cleaned. Isn’t the loss of this also a loss of revenue to the city?
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1c0lp34
Posted by Far_Activity_4136
3 Comments
Priorities….
Rip them off where ever you see them. Eventually they’ll run out of budget.
What’s crazy to me is that this is how a government pretending to be legitimate communicates? By running around the city in the dead of night with a stack of fliers and a pot of glue?