Twenty-five years after 9/11, analysts can’t decide whether al‑Qaeda got what it wanted, Graeme Wood reports:
Today, about half the world’s population is too young to remember the attacks. “Those who do will recall both the horror of the imagery—thousands dying on live television, in seconds—and the disorientation of the day. Nobody knew whether the four planes were the only ones, or whether 40 more were hurtling toward other targets,” Wood writes.
“If fear was the goal: mission accomplished. But fear was the means, not the end. The end was political change. And any assessment of al‑Qaeda, both on 9/11 and in the ensuing decades, should ask whether it leveraged that fear to bring about the political results it sought,” Wood continues.
— Katie Anthony, associate editor, audience and engagement, *The Atlantic*
shibbledoop on
I always wonder if the Taliban regretted harboring Bin Laden since they cared more about Afghan control than whatever Al Qaedas goals were.
TotalPop5 on
Aren’t they still active in Mali?
mrktcrash on
>”What Happened to al-Qaeda?”
Likely enjoying their harem of virgins.
aig818 on
They got decapitated and replaced by another group/s. Still around, still capable, but nowhere near what they used to be.
AnaRivera1981 on
They got decapitated and replaced by another group/s.
Michelangelor on
ISIS became the more dominant jihadist movement and attracted thousands away from al-Qaeda’s movement, and al-Qaeda became more regional and less globally organized
NextStomach6453 on
The leader of an offshoot branch is running Syria currently. They’re still alive as an organization.
Fast_Astronomer814 on
Just look toward the Sahel
optrin on
It probably would also “backfire” against al-Qaeda, but it’s so interesting he considered attacking the Strait of Hormuz to hurt financially the US economy.
kai_vt on
Still active in Nigeria. Trump recently authorised strikes against them there
11 Comments
Twenty-five years after 9/11, analysts can’t decide whether al‑Qaeda got what it wanted, Graeme Wood reports:
Today, about half the world’s population is too young to remember the attacks. “Those who do will recall both the horror of the imagery—thousands dying on live television, in seconds—and the disorientation of the day. Nobody knew whether the four planes were the only ones, or whether 40 more were hurtling toward other targets,” Wood writes.
“If fear was the goal: mission accomplished. But fear was the means, not the end. The end was political change. And any assessment of al‑Qaeda, both on 9/11 and in the ensuing decades, should ask whether it leveraged that fear to bring about the political results it sought,” Wood continues.
Read more: [https://theatln.tc/RyvtgYXa](https://theatln.tc/RyvtgYXa)
— Katie Anthony, associate editor, audience and engagement, *The Atlantic*
I always wonder if the Taliban regretted harboring Bin Laden since they cared more about Afghan control than whatever Al Qaedas goals were.
Aren’t they still active in Mali?
>”What Happened to al-Qaeda?”
Likely enjoying their harem of virgins.
They got decapitated and replaced by another group/s. Still around, still capable, but nowhere near what they used to be.
They got decapitated and replaced by another group/s.
ISIS became the more dominant jihadist movement and attracted thousands away from al-Qaeda’s movement, and al-Qaeda became more regional and less globally organized
The leader of an offshoot branch is running Syria currently. They’re still alive as an organization.
Just look toward the Sahel
It probably would also “backfire” against al-Qaeda, but it’s so interesting he considered attacking the Strait of Hormuz to hurt financially the US economy.
Still active in Nigeria. Trump recently authorised strikes against them there