Share.

    45 Comments

    1. I’ll preface this by saying this is by NO MEANS an accurate scientific map. The topic, the rise of sea levels, is very much talked about and is scientifically established, as well as the figure I used for the map (70 metres) but the rest is purely fictional, that is the new cities, names, routes, all that silliness that make this look forward in the future a little less painful because the ocean is indeed taking more and more land every year across the globe and it is a problem.

      1 metre is catastrophic enough but 70 metre almost looks like fantasy and leaves much room for the mischievous cartographet that I am. I tried to create new names based on all sort of things, ranging from celtic mythological names to funny slang that I tried to explore as non native english speaker. Ferry routes, seaplanes airports and canal are also just fun thoughts experiments! But they maybe make us ask ourselves how we are going to deal with this issue?

      Hope you like the map and your new country of residence!

    2. As a highlander this is a price I am willing to pay. Will need to get Hadrians wall sorted before the flooding mind.

    3. “Wetford” is hilarious because, as a Watfordian myself, Watford’s name comes from “Waet Ford” as in literally a ford through wetland.

      I guess we’d go back to our roots.

    4. Parts of this are really good and interesting as a thought experiment. And then there are super on the nose like shite-weather-bay and wanker’s shoals

    5. Not only does Birmingham survive, it already looks post-apocalyptic so you’d never notice the difference

    6. I’m just imagining the French looking at this map and deciding to burn every tyre they can find to hurry it along.

    7. Back during lockdowns I recall looking at a google maps overlay that showed which areas would be underwater at what levels of icecap meltage. Even at maximum, my house would be above water because I’m on a hill, but I’d have to use a rowboat to get out of my housing estate.

    8. Next time consider posting this as two images, with the current map as the second image. Allows folks to easily flip between the two images and really see the changes/comparison easily.

      This assumes that folks intuitively know the current image well enough to really appreciate the nuance.