pave it with bitumen, then the trucks can use it, business as usual.
Pirat6662001 on
Most predictable result, too late avoid now. At this point we are working to prevent even worse outcomes in 20 years considering the delay on effects of climate change. And we are behind on those also
PsychologicalRow7729 on
Quick explainer, because “25 cm” gets misread in every one of these threads: that’s the **Kaub gauge reading**, not how deep the river is. The Kaub gauge is a reference point , and the actual shipping channgel there is roughly 2m deeper. So the river hasn’t turned into a puddle. The real problem is that barges have to sail with a fraction of their normal load to avoid running aground. The captain in the article says he’s carrying over 80% less.
That’s why this hurts so much economically. A single Rhine barge carries about 3,000 t, and a truck carries about 25t. You can’t replace that with trucks or rail on short notice (or sustainably), so freight rates spike, and chemical plants and steel mills along the river start cutting production. We saw exactly this in 2018 and 2022.
What worries me more is the longer trend. The Rhine’s later summer flow depends a lot on Alpine snow and glacier melt, and that buffer keeps shrinking. There’s already a project to deepen the Middle Rhine bottleneck by about 20 cm, but it’s been delayed for years. Deepening the channel doesn’t help much if less water keeps coming down the river. Rotterdam, BASF and half of Germany’s industrial base depend on this river being boring. Its’s less boring every few years.
TheGoalkeeper on
Just dig it deeper /s
ephikles on
On the good side: Maybe we’ll finally see the Rheingold popping up somewhere!
But we shouldn’t let anyone make a ring out of it…
Arctic_Turtle on
Never mentioned in these articles… EU water framework directive from 2000 requires member states to restore rivers, which means Germany should have changed their practices with river barges no later than 2015. They have refused, and the reluctance of EU commission to give them a hefty fine undermines the credibility of EU legislation.
TwoPlyDreams on
Thank goodness they still have their V8’s, unrestricted autobahns, and filthy coal power plants to enjoy.
AnAncientOne on
And next year could be even worse.
peet192 on
Parrelell it with a railway
Alternative-Suit5541 on
Old news, nobody cares anymore
reuhka on
just throw in some air conditioners bro, crisis solved
11 Comments
pave it with bitumen, then the trucks can use it, business as usual.
Most predictable result, too late avoid now. At this point we are working to prevent even worse outcomes in 20 years considering the delay on effects of climate change. And we are behind on those also
Quick explainer, because “25 cm” gets misread in every one of these threads: that’s the **Kaub gauge reading**, not how deep the river is. The Kaub gauge is a reference point , and the actual shipping channgel there is roughly 2m deeper. So the river hasn’t turned into a puddle. The real problem is that barges have to sail with a fraction of their normal load to avoid running aground. The captain in the article says he’s carrying over 80% less.
That’s why this hurts so much economically. A single Rhine barge carries about 3,000 t, and a truck carries about 25t. You can’t replace that with trucks or rail on short notice (or sustainably), so freight rates spike, and chemical plants and steel mills along the river start cutting production. We saw exactly this in 2018 and 2022.
What worries me more is the longer trend. The Rhine’s later summer flow depends a lot on Alpine snow and glacier melt, and that buffer keeps shrinking. There’s already a project to deepen the Middle Rhine bottleneck by about 20 cm, but it’s been delayed for years. Deepening the channel doesn’t help much if less water keeps coming down the river. Rotterdam, BASF and half of Germany’s industrial base depend on this river being boring. Its’s less boring every few years.
Just dig it deeper /s
On the good side: Maybe we’ll finally see the Rheingold popping up somewhere!
But we shouldn’t let anyone make a ring out of it…
Never mentioned in these articles… EU water framework directive from 2000 requires member states to restore rivers, which means Germany should have changed their practices with river barges no later than 2015. They have refused, and the reluctance of EU commission to give them a hefty fine undermines the credibility of EU legislation.
Thank goodness they still have their V8’s, unrestricted autobahns, and filthy coal power plants to enjoy.
And next year could be even worse.
Parrelell it with a railway
Old news, nobody cares anymore
just throw in some air conditioners bro, crisis solved