Share.

    36 Comments

    1. Farage being against something which benefits the majority of people? Well fuck me, someone check water and make sure it’s still wet.

    2. I guess my question is, if Farage were a Russian asset what would he do differently.
      Really makes a fella wonder.

    3. And here I was thinking this self-absorbed, self-descrived patriot would be all in favour of reducing foreign interference in politics, but I guess that should only be excused for the US and Russia

    4. In the interest of fairness, it is purely a coincidence that Farage said the same pro Russia talking points as Nathan Gill (convicted of taking bribes to say pro Russian talking points in the European Parliament).

    5. ducksoupmilliband on

      Farage is wrong here.

      The explicit target of the National Centre for Information Defence is hostile foreign states (specifically Russia), rather than domestic citizens exercising free speech. 

      The stated purpose is to detect and disrupt state-backed cyber-attacks, deepfakes, bot farms, fake news websites, and the illegal forging of British organizational branding (such as universities and the BBC) not stopping normal people expressing opinion. 

    6. What’s the opposite of tone deaf. Not in a positive way.

      Something so completely on brand, to the degree that it perfectly sums up the accusations against you.

      Garage has chosen the exact perfect time to say the exactly correct thing, if he wanted people to believe the worst about him.

    7. Parking-Bet7989 on

      And people want yjos clearly “Good Faith” actor to be PM? Maybe there should be an emphasis on rhe word actor.

    8. It seems as if Burnham is talking about the UK government censoring and banning more things. And people will jump up to support it all because the Russians are a nuisance?

    9. TheWitchCapricorn on

      Why would you as a patriot have an issue with measures designed to keep foreigners interfering with you country’s sovereignty ?? Very suspicious, very unpatriotic, very Russian spy

    10. The real question is why we’re allowing a Russian agent to continue as a politician. Why wasn’t this cunt banned from politics when £300m/week lie came out.

    11. liesbuiltuponlies on

      It’s almost incredulous that my old boy would have had something in common with that Muppet Farage. He told me a story that many years ago when he was heavily involved in the trade unions the regional secretary wanted to send him to Soviet Russia to do a course in public speaking (as they were inclined to do). I couldn’t believe it and still take it with a grain of salt, but yeah there’s no way he’d go out to Soviet era Russia and not come back as some sort of asset.

    12. International-Bid907 on

      Direct Bullion — £405,000 — brand ambassador/promotional work.

      GB News — £233,299.20 — broadcasting/presenting.

      Cameo / Baron App Inc — £88,243.01 — personalised video messages.

      Telegraph Media Group — ~£48,000 — columnist, based on £4,000/month declared remuneration.

      News Pty / Sky News Australia — £45,198.26 — broadcasting/commentary.

      Club for Growth — £44,256.88 — speaking/consultancy; part of this was declared as expected remuneration rather than necessarily already paid.

      Blockworks Inc — £30,000 — speaking engagement.

      Zebu Group Ltd — £20,000 — speaking engagement.

      Hillsdale College — £11,349.29 — speaking engagement.

      Google — £9,108.84 — declared payment.

      X Corp — £2,422.34 — declared payment.

      Southbank Investment Research / Fortune & Freedom — £0 identified in this period — no evidence of current paid work; the reported paid relationship ended before this period.

      BTC Inc — £0 in this period — the £7,410 payment was received on 22 September 2025, just outside the 12-month period.

      Total of the identifiable amounts above: ~£936,878.

    13. Impossible-Race8239 on

      Stopping foreign governments using lies, manipulation and money to divide our country!? What will the wokerati do next???

    14. AlwaysSnacking22 on

      The Reform UK leader said the new centre would be the equivalent of a “Ministry of Truth to clamp down on free speech.”

      Scared of the truth Nigel?

    15. MapDiscombobulated1 on

      Russian Asset gets upset at measures aimed to stop Russian Assets fucking with our elections. 

    16. Careful-Tangerine986 on

      It’s hard to imagine why anybody would be against measures to prevent Russian interference in the UK. Unless………

    17. There always be some grifting politicians. WTF is wrong people who support him? They personally make him relevant or put him in power. There is nobody else to blame.

    18. Why would Farage be so against the idea of Russian money flowing into British politics?

      When Obama commented on the Brexit referendum, Farage was apoplectic at foreign interference.

      What changed?

      We know what changed, obviously….

    19. When Farage was interviewed by what I think was a German magazine, his first response to the question ‘who benefits from Brexit?’ was “Russia!”

      He then flustered a bit and insulted the journalist.