Absurd catch-22 doctrine means need an exact previous court finding or otherwise can freely violate your rights with impunity
Posted by theseusptosis
Absurd catch-22 doctrine means need an exact previous court finding or otherwise can freely violate your rights with impunity
Posted by theseusptosis
11 Comments
I actually laughed at this because of the pure fantasy that it is.
They dont want the best of security so dont have to ax the billionaires to get the funding.
Move to a better country!
That’s a lovely fantasy you got there
Why do police need guns?
It’s a no-brainer actually. Every fired bullet and every death in custody gets investigated.
Every agent and officer wears the body cam and is responsible for it to function.
No body-cam -> you personally bear the full responsibility for whatever happened.
If the footage shows, shots fired were warranted, you’re obviously let off the hook, otherwise you will be tried im court.
Cops need to be held to a HIGHER standard than the rest (while in duty) not a lower.
Qualified immunity is the absolute dumbest way to go. You want cops and government agents to be well trained, cautious and responsible. You know, to SERVE AND PROTECT.
https://preview.redd.it/8ms9hzghg9sh1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8cd6f3f6952c1128933a958d2d8c55e92491121b
Qualified immunity doesn’t need to end, just the evident philosophy by the legal system that it’s “absolute” immunity and not “qualified” immunity.
Make them carry malpractice insurance.
Yeah you could do that.
Or you just move to a civilized country.
Doctors have to get malpractice insurance – could something similar be done to cops?