Share.

    13 Comments

    1. I can understand the desire to be naked in nature, to a degree at least, but naked in a museum? At some point its just voyeurism. Still, I suppose its the right place for dirty old fossils…

    2. Really hoping it was a mistake and it was meant to be for naturalists, with the organiser getting the two muddled but it is genuinely for naturists to browse the museum in the buff.

      The idea of a load of visitors turning up naked and the organiser being a massive prude would have been funny.

    3. The Two Ronnies would have been all over this story. Especially as there’s a Thomas Hardy exhibit.

    4. ShowmasterQMTHH on

      this years special exhibition “Bones and Boners”

      Do the staff need to be naked as well ?

    5. sortofhappyish on

      Here we see two enormous ancient jugs. And if mrs smith would just turn to the left, she’ll see some Egyptian wine storage jars.

    6. sortofhappyish on

      Pro: nudists at the museum

      Con: Who introduce themselves with “yes, we’ve been nudists since we got married”

      <pause>

      “in 1955”

    7. First the up skirting exhibit we heard about, now this. These curators are clearly perverted individuals.