Share.

    42 Comments

    1. Christ, they truly are the inhabitants of your local pub in a political party

      just spout bollocks with next to zero knowledge

    2. Yes the leaders of Reform are this stupid:

      “The Boston and Skegness MP, who is attending his party’s first ever Scottish conference in Perth today, claimed Reform was the only party backing Scotland’s oil and gas industry, and that net zero targets were “making us all poorer and reducing our quality of life”.

      “We’re the only people with the courage to have a strong conviction about it, to think that we’ve gone down completely the wrong path,” he said. “Of course, we all care about the environment, and we all want cleaner air, but technology is a great thing.

      “Look, I’m lucky enough I’m able to afford a Tesla. So, you know, not some Luddite. Of course, climate change is really it always has been, always will be. **I just think there is a naive arrogance about people who think that you can stop the power of the sun, you can stop the power of volcanoes, you can’t.**

      “What you’ve got to do, and it would be much, much cheaper, is adapt to it. Where you’ve got concerns about sea level defences and sea level rise, **guess what? A bit of steel, a bit of cement, some aggregate… and you build some concrete sea level defences**. That’s how you deal with rising sea levels. It costs you a fraction of the price of the trillions of pounds that’s being wasted naively, unilaterally in the United Kingdom.”

      Spoken like the true grifter clown show Reform UK are.

    3. Really great that this guy is going to get £80m from the guy who just installed a rapist as President of the US

    4. Ill_Refrigerator_593 on

      It’s very odd that the same people who used to wrongly tell us man made climate change doesn’t exist are now telling us it does exist but we shouldn’t try & do anything about it.

      Although I wonder if their opinions on electric cars being a “strain” on the environment will now change.

    5. Simple solutions to complex problems.

      Reform know their audience well, I’ll give them that.

    6. Technically he’s not wrong. You can protect the UK from sea rise by building the biggest wall ever constructed, using probably all the concrete and aggregate in the world a few times over and then have to rebuild it again when sea level keeps rising anyway.

    7. The amount of global warming/climate change that is “locked-in” is massive. Even if we stopped **all** human activity today, we’d *still* see significant climate change – including sea levels rising. IIRC if all the ice in ice caps, glaciers, etc. melted, sea levels would rise ~70m.

      IMO we should prepare for this likely scenario, even if we want to prevent it. There is only so much Britain can do to reduce the globally-caused changes, and if we need to adapt anyway – then we should focus more resources on adaptation (e.g. flood defences, winterizing infrastructure, not building on floodplains, etc.)

      I don’t think people understand the inertia of climate – the next ~100 years of change are already set in stone.

    8. Dedj_McDedjson on

      Classic example of a politician looking at things simplistically and thniking he’s a genius because the solution is simple.

    9. They say this because their base believes this shit. Grifters are not stupid, their marks are.

    10. He’s the MP for fucking Skeg, the entire coast needs defences as loads of it is near or below sea level.

      That wanker knows this and knows it’d be unimaginably expensive to do, half his constituency is going to have to live with wet knees or leave in the not too distant future.

    11. so a concrete wall around, that will stop the boats as well! thats his real reason for a nicve big wall. muppet

    12. This is basically Reforms view on climate stuff based on their pledges. Reduce budget, stop investments into technological advancements like carbon recapture projects, the idea we’ll get by planting trees…

    13. UuusernameWith4Us on

      He’s inadvertently giving a good illustration of why preventing/minimising climate change is good for the economy, even if it might not be the best thing for short term growth (won’t anyone think of the shareholders?). 

      Building a wall around the whole country would cost an absolutely obscene sum of money, it’s completely unaffordable. In reality only places with high economic output will be protected, less productive areas will be sacrificed to the sea. Huge swathes of farmland and left behind towns will be lost. The cost of food, housing, building materials will skyrocket.

    14. No no, let’s give him a chance with this idea. I say we flatten the entire country, completely level everything we have built. Then, we build a giant new foundation out of steel and concrete as suggested that will raise the entire country 100m higher into the air. Then we just rebuild things.

      Added bonus for removing hills entirely.

      That should give us another 6 months to survive, given the current rate of the climate crisis.

    15. What a knob.
      Even my GCSE level geography classes decades ago taught us that if the sea wants to go somewhere a bit of concrete and even massive boulders ain’t going to stop it.

    16. These folks are going to be a concern in the next general election if they don’t have an actual opposition. It’s generally worrysome as they have a lot of the younger vote currently.

    17. RagingAthenian on

      First Trump, now this guy? Why do all of these people think a damn wall is the solution to all of our problems?

    18. Agreeable_Falcon1044 on

      i mean…yes you can build flood defences, but it sort of ignores the point. How high will you have to build these around Tuvalu (that’s already lost many of it’s outer islands) to prevent king tides? It would look like a Waterworld set….

    19. He continued on after his 8th pint “and if you think about it the swimming trunk market will explode and we can sell them! LET’S OPEN A BAR!!!!”

    20. Guy_Incognito97 on

      What I’m learning from the right is that all problems can be solved by building a big wall.

    21. Sure why not use the stuff that’s between his ears. I’m sure he can get a refill from the concrete farmer Mike Graham

    22. Necessary-Product361 on

      He does realize that even if we were able to turn the entire coastline into a concrete wall, which would probably cost Trillions, we would still have to deal with an enormous global food and refugee crisis.

    23. Right.

      These are the people that Elon Musk wants to give 100 million quid to.

      These people. Who say things like this.

    24. I mean they’re not wrong, its just uh, well frankly it would be cheaper to go green than do that.

      Realistically, London and a handful of others will get it, and places like skegg and clacton will be let flood

    25. Puzzleheaded-Bet9829 on

      What is it with these cunts, anyone remember the quality of certain buildings with that poor quality concrete, yeah lets put that in the sea, which is salty and constantly moving, but i made millions doing it so who cares if it works or not, and old barry down the pub puts two braincells together and thinks, what a good idea, whilst the drool running down his chin has it’s own eco system

    26. Cameron nailed it when he described Farage and his fellow travellers as pub bores: self-regarding ‘realists’ who simplify complex problems to arrive at solutions that make perfect sense in their own minds – classic populism. Let’s start a Go Fund Me to ship Tice over to the South Pacific with a digger, a cement mixer and lots of steel so he can shore up the low-lying islands against rising sea levels. Proof of concept.

    27. TheTreeDweller on

      Reminds me of the bellend on whatever TV show it was that tried to argue you could grow concrete

    28. Colour me surprised. I assumed the proposal would be something more along the lines of small boats immigrants stacked in a wall of human sandbags.

    29. So any low lying coast needs a massive wall round it?

      Then what with the rivers? Just keep on walling up them?