Last year, immigration was the *sole* driver of population growth for the first time – UK citizens’ deaths actually outnumbered births, in a year that saw the biggest UK population increase since those records began in 1971. Immigration is now literally the only thing growing the population at record pace and creating the need for so much housing.
Per Migration Observatory, immigration is expected to drive 92% of the UK’s population growth to 2046, as we go from 67 million to 77 million. If net migration were 0, the population would shrink slightly from the levels now by 2031, and be around 65 million by 2046.
These predictions have usually only ever been wrong since the 1990s for one reason – they’ve underestimated future immigration. They previously thought we’d peak at 61 million by 2023, but we’re at 67 million.
If you ever feel like our infrastructure is overstretched, like it feels “crowded” in this country, especially in England, bear this in mind.
The idea that this is “all because of immigrants” sounds like a dumb bigoted talking point. But per the data above, this is *literally* the case for the explosion in our population. It’s also worth noting that every election winner since Blair has been promising to reduce and control immigration.
The question, therefore, is do you want to see even more of this country concreted over, to see villages and towns all around the country expanded, and our infrastructure even more overloaded, just so that we can continue mass immigration?
Condorz1 on
This time, they really need to crack on with reducing immigration. Also, adults one in one out policy IMO.
We can’t keep building our way out of this, even if it’s been at a reluctant snails pace in the past 15 years +
LondonDude123 on
Remember guys, we need 1.5m houses that arent built yet, but we have enough houses for the 2.5m people that will show up while were building the 1.5m…
Thats not be being facetious, thats the deputy PM saying so
Condorz1 on
I’d still rather do the one in one out for several years, then we can open some of the immigration levers again
Night_Science on
What do successive governments and/or the British people hate so much about increasing the density of and generally rebuilding our cities to be much more effective population centres that instead we/they resort to creating low density, poorly serviced housing on land that – even if currently ‘grey’ – could be farmed on or restored to wilderness.
We could effectively house people in this country if our cities weren’t so good awful.
Bat_Flaps on
Imagine a decade-long, national effort to just fucking build millions of homes. Good, sustainable, eco-friendly, aesthetically pleasing, functional homes in communities with mandatory green space, access to amenities and thriving social hubs. Just fucking imagine if we made that a national priority…
[deleted] on
[removed]
CrypticCodedMind on
Would be helpful if they’d also more strictly regulate the quality and standards of construction in new-build developments.
kuindoo on
Maybe the native population would have a vague chance of reproducing if they were able to afford to live to a very basic standard, just a shot in the dark
wildeaboutoscar on
They can raise the targets as much as they want but they need to actually deliver and they haven’t done so for years now (government as a whole). Without sufficient financial support and regulations to stop speculative development it’s going to be really difficult to meet the targets.
I would love for them to meet their targets. I want a place of my own preferably before I turn 40. I just don’t think things will accelerate from 0-90 in even the span of a five year government term. I hope I’m wrong though.
10 Comments
Last year, immigration was the *sole* driver of population growth for the first time – UK citizens’ deaths actually outnumbered births, in a year that saw the biggest UK population increase since those records began in 1971. Immigration is now literally the only thing growing the population at record pace and creating the need for so much housing.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/10/08/migration-drives-fastest-population-increase-since-1970s/#:~:text=Migration%20has%20been%20the%20main,the%20year%20to%20mid%2D2023.
Per Migration Observatory, immigration is expected to drive 92% of the UK’s population growth to 2046, as we go from 67 million to 77 million. If net migration were 0, the population would shrink slightly from the levels now by 2031, and be around 65 million by 2046.
https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/the-impact-of-migration-on-uk-population-growth/
These predictions have usually only ever been wrong since the 1990s for one reason – they’ve underestimated future immigration. They previously thought we’d peak at 61 million by 2023, but we’re at 67 million.
If you ever feel like our infrastructure is overstretched, like it feels “crowded” in this country, especially in England, bear this in mind.
The idea that this is “all because of immigrants” sounds like a dumb bigoted talking point. But per the data above, this is *literally* the case for the explosion in our population. It’s also worth noting that every election winner since Blair has been promising to reduce and control immigration.
The question, therefore, is do you want to see even more of this country concreted over, to see villages and towns all around the country expanded, and our infrastructure even more overloaded, just so that we can continue mass immigration?
This time, they really need to crack on with reducing immigration. Also, adults one in one out policy IMO.
We can’t keep building our way out of this, even if it’s been at a reluctant snails pace in the past 15 years +
Remember guys, we need 1.5m houses that arent built yet, but we have enough houses for the 2.5m people that will show up while were building the 1.5m…
Thats not be being facetious, thats the deputy PM saying so
I’d still rather do the one in one out for several years, then we can open some of the immigration levers again
What do successive governments and/or the British people hate so much about increasing the density of and generally rebuilding our cities to be much more effective population centres that instead we/they resort to creating low density, poorly serviced housing on land that – even if currently ‘grey’ – could be farmed on or restored to wilderness.
We could effectively house people in this country if our cities weren’t so good awful.
Imagine a decade-long, national effort to just fucking build millions of homes. Good, sustainable, eco-friendly, aesthetically pleasing, functional homes in communities with mandatory green space, access to amenities and thriving social hubs. Just fucking imagine if we made that a national priority…
[removed]
Would be helpful if they’d also more strictly regulate the quality and standards of construction in new-build developments.
Maybe the native population would have a vague chance of reproducing if they were able to afford to live to a very basic standard, just a shot in the dark
They can raise the targets as much as they want but they need to actually deliver and they haven’t done so for years now (government as a whole). Without sufficient financial support and regulations to stop speculative development it’s going to be really difficult to meet the targets.
I would love for them to meet their targets. I want a place of my own preferably before I turn 40. I just don’t think things will accelerate from 0-90 in even the span of a five year government term. I hope I’m wrong though.