The 35 seconds is about a 30% decrease vs the playoff average last year (49.75 seconds)
21.5 of the 35 seconds was when the camera fixed on Taylor Swift and WNBA star Caitlin Clark sitting together coming out of a commercial break. During that 21.5 seconds, most of the time the announcers were talking about Caitlin Clark and her accolades.
Cheese0089 on
And people will still complain
A_Mirabeau_702 on
Still an improvement on previous years
sgrams04 on
I know I’m in the minority here. But it doesn’t matter what percentage of the entire broadcast including commercials she’s shown. She was shown six times and I literally could care less about her. I feel like it’s being shoved down my throat on purpose.
I like Taylor Swift. I like her music. I like the charity work she does. I think she’s a wonderful person. Show her once or twice and ok, I know she’s there thanks. Show her four more times for no reason and I’ll start rolling my eyes.
lazyoldsailor on
You disturb me. I love it!
Simply827 on
2004 sure feels like last year.
shirleysparrow on
The Taylor Swift sub has a game day thread every time Taylor is there. It’s full of positive energy, with lots of longtime football fans mingling with people who just started getting curious when Taylor started going. People explain game rules to new fans, everyone talks about the game, and it’s such a cheerful, positive place. I also know dads who are thrilled their daughters want to watch with them and spend time together. Anyone complaining about a few seconds of seeing a woman in the stands needs to get a grip. It’s not that serious. Let people have fun and be glad more people are watching football, if that’s something you care about.
actualspacepimp on
.32% to much tbh. They rarely show other players girlfriends and wives.
bdw666 on
You should have another graph comparing the airtimes of each game. Also what’s the 2004? Btw this is awesome. Gave you a few thumbs ups
iBarber111 on
Such a misleading way to present it. If they showed some random fan 6 times, people would go: “hey why do they keep showing this guy”?
10 Comments
Chart: Excel
Source: Me with a stop watch
The 35 seconds is about a 30% decrease vs the playoff average last year (49.75 seconds)
21.5 of the 35 seconds was when the camera fixed on Taylor Swift and WNBA star Caitlin Clark sitting together coming out of a commercial break. During that 21.5 seconds, most of the time the announcers were talking about Caitlin Clark and her accolades.
And people will still complain
Still an improvement on previous years
I know I’m in the minority here. But it doesn’t matter what percentage of the entire broadcast including commercials she’s shown. She was shown six times and I literally could care less about her. I feel like it’s being shoved down my throat on purpose.
I like Taylor Swift. I like her music. I like the charity work she does. I think she’s a wonderful person. Show her once or twice and ok, I know she’s there thanks. Show her four more times for no reason and I’ll start rolling my eyes.
You disturb me. I love it!
2004 sure feels like last year.
The Taylor Swift sub has a game day thread every time Taylor is there. It’s full of positive energy, with lots of longtime football fans mingling with people who just started getting curious when Taylor started going. People explain game rules to new fans, everyone talks about the game, and it’s such a cheerful, positive place. I also know dads who are thrilled their daughters want to watch with them and spend time together. Anyone complaining about a few seconds of seeing a woman in the stands needs to get a grip. It’s not that serious. Let people have fun and be glad more people are watching football, if that’s something you care about.
.32% to much tbh. They rarely show other players girlfriends and wives.
You should have another graph comparing the airtimes of each game. Also what’s the 2004? Btw this is awesome. Gave you a few thumbs ups
Such a misleading way to present it. If they showed some random fan 6 times, people would go: “hey why do they keep showing this guy”?