Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Bluesky Threads [OC] Probability of qualifying for the next phase of the UEFA Champions League Mathematics vs. Bookmakers Posted by TheKitof
TheKitof on January 23, 2025 3:04 pm Chart produced with : For [oddschecker.com](http://oddschecker.com) bookmaker data (data from 01/23 at 9am EST, may vary since) For the mathematical model, simulation of 100,000 matches with a poisson distribution of 1.2 for goals. Tool: Excel
blackkeymaster on January 23, 2025 4:46 pm „how to read the chart“. Maybe if I could read the text I would be able to read the chart.
jpj77 on January 24, 2025 4:34 am Manchester City winning at home vs. Club Brugge only has a 36% according to the analytical model? They’re in poor form but that still seems to call into question the model.
Loightsout on January 24, 2025 10:53 am Who or what chose the club names to display? Bayern M., B. Dortmund Paris, PSV Athleti??? Inconsistency at its best.
rchurch26 on January 24, 2025 1:13 pm Definitely worth pointing out that anyone looking at this post should not use it as reason to place bets given the clear flaws in the modelling. You don’t find many edges of ~50%, if you did, betting would be a lot more profitable for a lot more people.
kdnlcln on January 24, 2025 11:20 pm This is not Mathematics v Bookmakers. This is one model (with some dubious output) v a composite of many models plus wisdom of the crowds.
7 Comments
Chart produced with :
For [oddschecker.com](http://oddschecker.com) bookmaker data (data from 01/23 at 9am EST, may vary since)
For the mathematical model, simulation of 100,000 matches with a poisson distribution of 1.2 for goals.
Tool: Excel
„how to read the chart“. Maybe if I could read the text I would be able to read the chart.
Manchester City winning at home vs. Club Brugge only has a 36% according to the analytical model?
They’re in poor form but that still seems to call into question the model.
Who or what chose the club names to display?
Bayern M., B. Dortmund
Paris, PSV
Athleti???
Inconsistency at its best.
Definitely worth pointing out that anyone looking at this post should not use it as reason to place bets given the clear flaws in the modelling.
You don’t find many edges of ~50%, if you did, betting would be a lot more profitable for a lot more people.
That means none of the Portuguese teams can reach 8th?
This is not Mathematics v Bookmakers. This is one model (with some dubious output) v a composite of many models plus wisdom of the crowds.