These guys are criminally underappreciated. It's a gamechanger technology.
Prometheus Fuels employs a process that captures CO₂ directly from the atmosphere and, using water and electricity, converts it into fuels such as gasoline and jet fuel. This method involves innovative catalysts and carbon nanotube membranes to facilitate the conversion efficiently. The company has licensed advanced catalysts developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which are among the most effective globally for converting CO₂ into alcohols and subsequently into fuels.
Despite its promise, the technology faces challenges such as achieving cost competitiveness with fossil fuels, ensuring energy efficiency, and establishing the infrastructure necessary for large-scale deployment. Overcoming these hurdles is crucial for widespread adoption.
Future Plans
Prometheus Fuels aims to scale its technology to produce carbon-neutral fuels at a commercial level, making them accessible and affordable. The company is also exploring applications in various sectors, including shipping and aviation, to broaden the impact of its sustainable fuels.
In summary, Prometheus Fuels is at the forefront of developing innovative solutions to address climate change by transforming atmospheric CO₂ into sustainable fuels. While challenges remain, their advancements in science and technology, coupled with strategic partnerships, position them as a significant player in the future of renewable energy
https://prometheusfuels.com/connect
8 Comments
Energy still has to come from somewhere, I bet it’s electricity. So this is basically just using the atmosphere as a very inefficient battery.
**Submission Statement:**
Imagine fueling your car with gasoline made from thin air—literally. Prometheus Fuels is harnessing cutting-edge technology to capture CO₂ from the atmosphere, convert it using renewable energy and advanced catalysts, and produce carbon-neutral fuels. Unlike traditional biofuels, these electrofuels (e-fuels) don’t require land or crops and work seamlessly with existing fuel infrastructure.
Current production costs range from $3 to $6 per liter compared to $0.50 to $1.50 for fossil fuels. However, with technological advancements and economies of scale, prices are projected to drop to around €2 per liter by 2030. The potential environmental impact is enormous—offsetting gigatons of carbon emissions without needing to replace cars, planes, or ships.
Yet this breakthrough is flying under the radar. We need governments and private investors to accelerate and support its development. Why are we inundated with news about scandals and spectacles but rarely hear about technological marvels that could transform our world?!
This really demands attention, funding, and policy support for Prometheus Fuels and similar ventures. The future of sustainable energy could be right in the air around us—literally.
So, it’s literally fuel burning in reverse.
If we had access to infinite and cheap energy (nuclear fusion) but struggled with good batteries – this made sense, because gasoline has great energy density, far exceeding existing and experimental batteries.
Until then – it’s just dumb.
I believe at one point Germany tried to get E-fuels classified as green, the EU said no and now the Germanies car industry is dying.
The fuel that resulted from this process are known as e-fuel or synthetic fuel.
The most likely use will be to turn CO2 into alcohol which will be further turned into jet fuel, since batteries and hydrogen are still not ideal for planes atm.
If i remember correctly, close to the end of WW2 German scientists did figure out how to do this, it was just too little too late to help their war fighter struggling to find ever gallon of fuel they could use.
Sounds like creative energy accounting. I’d like to see a Sankey diagram of how this is produced. I’m pretty sure it’s woefully inefficient. And you’re still left with a less than ideal fuel.
If we use green and renewable energy to produce fuel sources we should be moving away from because they are inefficient and hold us back, then we’re not using common sense.
This is absolutely nothing new to be honest. The problem with this approach is the immense energy consumption. It takes a ton of energy and is way less efficient than EVs or even hydrogen cars. But yeah, in a world with unlimited and extremely cheap energy this would be a very good solution. Unfortunately we don’t live in such a world.