UK orders Apple to give it access to users’ encrypted accounts, Washington Post reports

    https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-asks-apple-let-it-spy-users-encrypted-accounts-washington-post-reports-2025-02-07/

    Posted by BestButtons

    Share.

    35 Comments

    1. > Britain’s security officials have ordered that Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab create a so-called ‘back door’ allowing them to retrieve all the content any Apple user worldwide has uploaded to the cloud, The Washington Post reported on Friday citing people familiar with the matter.

      It has begun.

      > The iPhone maker is likely to stop offering encrypted storage in the UK, rather than break the security promises it made to its users everywhere, the report said, citing unnamed sources.

      Welcome to a society without secure services.

    2. Utterly mad. Amazed Apple will not turn down this request or simply threaten not to sell them in the UK. They’d change their tune pretty quick then.

    3. AveragelyBrilliant on

      So, where are the IfYouveGotNothingToHideYouHaveNothingToFear brigade? They usually turn up to these threads pretty sharpish.

    4. honkymotherfucker1 on

      Ah yes time for my daily reminder that the concept of privacy is long forgotten in the modern world.

      These fucking governments are pathetic. Cost of living going up, rising inequality, civil unrest, public services going down the pan in the face of underfunding.

      What do we do? Invade citizens privacy more. Good stuff. Cunts.

    5. ReasonableWill4028 on

      I would rather Apple leave the UK than give in to the government.

      I hope Trump stops this from happening.

    6. Every few years some authoritarian moron suggests this nonsense and every few years they get slapped down.

      If you’re not familiar with the history, google the “Clipper Chip”.

      The technological ignorance demonstrated by this government is frankly embarrassing.

    7. Ok_Organization1117 on

      “retrieve all the content any Apple user worldwide has uploaded to the cloud”

      Good luck with that I guess?

    8. Immediate-Expert-139 on

      What’s the point? Because even when people are flagged as potential risks, the police do fuck all about it anyway? They’ll continue to spy on everybody In the name of “safety” but refuse to act on their findings.

    9. DuckManQuackFu on

      Jfc, can we have just a few weeks at least without some authoritarian bullshit being thrust upon us.

    10. average_as_hell on

      I see a lot of people saying that this is the thin end of the wedge and they will be coming for this on all platforms.

      I work in enterprise grade storage for UK companies running international business. Everything we work with is encrypted and in most cases re-encrypted as it moves between storage.

      This is a legal requirement for insurance alongside hosting certain types of information.

      So where does this end? Whats to stop someone in a small compaby just keeping all their personal stuff in enterprise grade cloud storage thats encrypted with your own keys

    11. iamezekiel1_14 on

      Hilarious – they get to see my Resident Evil saves. Apart from that I have nothing on there.

    12. I’m am not and have never been Tory voter, but I must say Labour governments do this every single time they get into power. They are obsessed with constantly writing legislation that eats away at civil liberties and privacy under the boogeyman of “crime and national security.” Whether it’s insane internet censorship or National ID schemes or counter terror laws that dance the on the line of violating European Human Rights such as indefinite detention without charge. Starmer’s government is just a repackaged version of Blair’s new Labour platform, the problem is that like New Pence or New Order, New Labour isn’t that new anymore, they tried going back to the Corbyn socialist club front bench and they suffered a humiliating defeat as the majority of British voters don’t particularly like old school socialist politicians. As a consequence of all this, Labour is forced to enter the murky grey waters of “centrist politics” which tend to please no one and upset everyone. This Labour government will only serve a single term as 7 months in and they are already more unpopular than the Tories, who happen to be a collection of incredibly unlikeable people. Go figure. The moral of the story is don’t elect a prosecutor to be Prime Minister, they see EVERYTHING as a proverbial nail that must be hammered in by legislation.

    13. Did you learn nothing from the Salt Typhoon attack? I know America is trying their hardest not to, but the hack exploited these kind of “official back doors” particularly because getting access to the system means you’ve now got access to everything. It’s too juicy of a target for local crooks but especially well equipped foreign adversaries. This is advocating for knocking down a solid wall to replace it with a paper thin door on weak hinges, and telling us it’s just as safe and secure as before, after your neighbors were just broken into in that exact scenario.

    14. Estimated-Delivery on

      I suspect this was aimed at major crime groups and would require court orders which are designed to ensure the average citizen is not involved. The UK is generally not considered a police state. I think a measure of calm would be sensible. Anyway Apple can go running to Trump and, for a fee, he would threaten us with 200% tariff for Rolls Royce cars sold over in the US.

    15. Smart_Joke3740 on

      There is a huge difference here between ‘back door with a warrant’, and ‘back door with no warrant’. If it’s the latter, this is exactly the type of overreach Snowdon was aiming to bring attention to. Most law abiding people agree that access should be provided if it follows a legal process with a visible audit trail, but it’s imperative we don’t have young security analysts straight out of uni digging into random people’s personal lives with no accountability, no end user awareness, audit trail or court ordered process imo.

      Edit – to be clear, I’m against any back door being created or used for any suggestion of any crime without evidence. I’m saying that this wouldn’t be impacting normal end users if the back door was there for extreme, time sensitive cases (with a warrant or emergency powers) – like preventing a terrorist attack, mass murder etc. I suppose the problem is how do you ensure proper oversight without abuse of powers.

    16. darkmatters2501 on

      This is why I hate people who have zero knowledge of a matter passing legislation on it.

      You don’t put a back doors in to encryption for a good fucking reason if there is a back door it falls apart.

    17. No-Problem-6453 on

      F*** the UK government. This is by definition a police state. Hilariously, our only option is immense pressure from other countries seeing as they’re now demanding access to other country citizens data.

    18. I have to admit, I kept reading people in the comments mentioning the UK had laws to force people to give up their encryption keys or face fines / jail time and I thought it was sketchy at best, so out of curiosity I asked ChatGPT, this was the reply I got:

      >”Yes, there is some truth to that statement. In the UK, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) 2000 includes provisions that require individuals to provide decryption keys to law enforcement when requested. Failure to comply with this requirement can lead to criminal penalties, including imprisonment.

      >Specifically, Section 49 of RIPA allows authorities to issue a notice requiring a person to provide access to encrypted information. If a person fails to comply with such a notice, they can face a fine or imprisonment for up to two years.

      >This law has raised concerns regarding privacy and the extent of government surveillance, but it is indeed a legal requirement in the UK.”

      I’m even more shocked that it was introduced in the year 2000 and I’d never even heard of it, learn something new everyday.

      Can’t even blame the Conservatives for it either, was Tony Blair, Sheesh.

    19. -stoneinfocus- on

      I hate the implications of the OSA. It’s difficult to talk about because people immediately assume that if you’re against it then I must be worried about something bad getting out that I’m hiding. 

      I am at the point now where in the seven stages of grief I’m getting toward acceptance. I’ve been angry, depressed, I’ve emailed my MP, and now I’m just fed up of feeling like this and there’s nothing I can do to stop it. 

      I’m going to need to prove my ID on loads of websites, adult and otherwise. I’m going to lose access to dozens of small forums I visit for hobbies. Nothing online will be secure and private again. 

      I’ve got tor, I’ve got a vpn, I am pretty tech savvy but the fact is that next month the internet as it is now ceases to exist in the uk. But the genuine problems of people being relentlessly exploited by social media giants will go untouched, despite the overwhelming evidence to show that meta, musk et al have sinister ambitions. The misinformation pushed by conspiracies and propaganda from all extremes of the political spectrum will continue to radicalise the public unimpeded but the right to any semblance of privacy for normal people is going away. 

      Of all the tech companies I had sort of hoped Apple would resist these insane attempts to break encryption, since privacy on Apple devices has been a selling point for years. 

      The worst part of this all is, no matter who got your vote, they all want this. It’ll only get worse. 

      I sincerely hope that come the 15th march so much damage is done and the public backlash is so severe that they’re forced to rescind it. I doubt it though. 

    20. jamesmksmith88 on

      I’m sorry, but what is the big deal about this?! I’m a fairly private person, but I certainly don’t believe that if I am being charged with something or other; my data be encrypted or I can use this to delay or scupper an investigation.

    21. If GCHQ can’t even hack Apple then what’s their point?

      Are they too busy with Russia and China and it’s just not worth their time or are they really that incompetent that the UK government have to go ask for the data?

    22. No-Problem-6453 on

      This is a blatant abuse of power—a legal, yet absolutely outrageous overreach into our private lives. The UK government’s move to force Apple to create a backdoor is a dangerous precedent that not only strips away our right to privacy but also sets us on a collision course with a dystopian future. The fact that Apple would commit a crime to even tell us that they have been requested to implement a backdoor is outrageous abuse of power.

      It’s no secret that the government has repeatedly exploited vaguely defined laws like those against online hate to justify invasive surveillance. Now, with this order, they’re effectively giving law enforcement carte blanche to rummage through every digital corner of our lives, even on a global scale. Imagine a scenario where a flimsy or entirely unrelated charge could be used as a pretext to pry into your personal communications and cloud storage—finding incriminating evidence after the fact. This isn’t about protecting us; it’s about normalizing a system where the state can intrude into our digital lives with impunity.

      And let’s not forget where technology is heading. With AI evolving at breakneck speed, we’re staring down the barrel of a reality where real-time, massive surveillance isn’t science fiction—it’s an imminent threat. The tools already in play, reminiscent of the methods exploited by Cambridge Analytica, are only the tip of the iceberg. Soon, systems that mimic the mass population-level controls depicted in Orwell’s 1984 could become an everyday reality. In a world where every digital interaction is monitored, our freedoms are not only at risk—they’re being systematically dismantled.

    23. TheCookieButter on

      I hope every company in the world tells the UK government to fuck off rather than implement these insane privacy destroying backdoors. Utter lunacy.

    24. Abso-fucking-lutely insane overreach. Anyone who actively supports this has an IQ no greater than room temperature.

    25. You know what, I don’t like it.

      The thought of having people access your data isn’t great, but lets be real. All of it is being sold to the highest bidder anyway.

      If it seriously saves one single child from a predator, catches one of these grooming gangs, or prevents an act of terror then it’d be worth it in my eyes.

      I don’t have anything compromising on any of my device and I don’t give the police a reason to look through my things. My liberties will be unaffected and my life will go on to be exactly the same with or without this bill.

      I know this’ll be unpopular, but I believe it’ll do more good than bad.

    26. And nobody ever said that someone could not subvert a government?

      Looks westwards, sheepishly.

    27. So they can arrest you for speech and also access your encrypted conversations? Sounds like a great combination…

    28. Western countries will bleat on about how china/russia etc want to steal our data but will simultaneously pull stunts like this. This digital age is hell on earth and I hate what we have become

    29. LightBackground9141 on

      I’m not Apples biggest fan but come on.. you can’t give anybody this access and the trust we have for governments.. definitely not them! Data just would no longer be safe.. this is basics and UK government needs somebody to tell them straight to leave it.

    30. Reddit_Banned_Me_444 on

      The Home Office and British Government are a fucking laughing stock of the world.