>Upskirting is a criminal offence in the UK, and the photo was removed from picture sites following it becoming a criminal offence. The photo was taken without Narinder’s knowledge or consent when it was sent to pictures sites by the paparazzi.
And Narinder Kaur has, apparently, reported this to the police.
Edit: missing words because I got a work call while typing…
NuPNua on
I don’t understand how any women would be convinced to vote for his party. Between this and the Ava Evans comments he’s quite clearly a misogynist in the true sense of the word, not how it gets bandied about these days.
chambo143 on
What a truly despicable man.
>In response Fox’s defence, another user replied: “Surely you must see that “mocking” someone isn’t on the same level as posting intimate images of them online without their consent. It’s like if someone said you were a racist, you couldn’t then accuse them of the crime of being a paedophile it’s not an equal response.”
Well that’s a far fetched hypothetical, I doubt old Laurence would ever find himself in a situation like that
RofiBie on
This looks to be an open and shut case here. What he posted constitutes a criminal offence. He was asked to remove it and actively refused, even after it was pointed out that it was a criminal offence.
The man is both deranged and makes his political moves by just being a vile human-being as some form of political shock-jock to garner publicity.
In other words, a scumbag.
Youbunchoftwats on
Hasn’t he just paid out £180k to two defendants? Lol, time to open your wallet again, Lozza.
Powerful-Pudding6079 on
Given that assault is a crime, I believe everyone who encounters Laurence Fox should cordially invite him to a boxing match.
SuperrVillain85 on
Lol the irony of that twitter post he made in Dec 2023:
>Close the borders.
>Scrap the licence fee.
>Scrap Net Zero.
>Ban ESG and DEI.
>Cull the public sector by 80%
>Declare war on woke.
>Protect families.
>**Protect women.**
>Protect children.
>Reduce taxes.
>Instantiate free speech in UK law.
>Take back our institutions.
>It’s not hard.
Apparently it is hard for ol’ Lozza (or he just doesn’t think the brown ones count as women).
Healthy_Direction_18 on
Is this guy allergic to money? Seems to hate hanging onto the stuff.
BigDumbGreenMong on
I’d forgoten this bell existed until I went to vote in the mayoral elections this morning and saw his name at the bottom of the list, along with all the other independent also-rans.
_Digress on
Wasn’t he done a few years ago for posting something on social media? Does this man ever learn?
LauraPhilps7654 on
Damn he’s really looking like someone left Oswald Mosely in the oven too long…
jrjolley on
Is there ever a time when Fox isn’t in the news? He’s always doing wacked things, wonder if he’s on drugs?
illbeinthestatichome on
Does this prick pose as if he’s talking to a crowd like Hitler used to? Certainly looks like it.
Fuzzy-Disaster2103 on
Just when you think he’s reached peak bellend, he goes and ups his game
Happytallperson on
S.33 Disclosing private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress – Criminal Justice and Courts Act.Â
Starting point for this incident would be about 26 weeks in chokey. (Assuming Higher Culpability and Medium Harm)
What the hell is wrong with this guy, genuinely starting to wonder if he’s on crack, had a bad blow to the head or some sort of condition that affects rational and cognitive ability.Â
Ochib on
Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 part 1 section 33
It is an offence for a person to disclose a private sexual photograph or film if the disclosure is made—
(a)without the consent of an individual who appears in the photograph or film, and
(b)with the intention of causing that individual distress.
A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine (or both), and
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine (or both).
Looks like porridge may be on the menu for Mr Fox
Lastaria on
Was he a completely different person when Billie Piper met him? I am trying to fathom what she saw in him. I can only assume he has had a complete personality change since.
ZakalweTheChairmaker on
Judging by the photo atop the page Lozza seems keen to emulate Heinrich Himmler in both philosophy and appearance.
Worra bawbag.
Present_End_6886 on
 ‘**The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.**’
Whilst Fox has a wealthy backer (Jeremy Hosking) who funds his awful behaviour this basically gives him a free licence to act illegally and keep paying his way out.
A short custodial sentence however, even a few months, would scare the shit out of this braggard.
So my suggestion is the next time he can’t control himself, let’s skip the whole fines bit and look at some time away from the public?
20 Comments
>Upskirting is a criminal offence in the UK, and the photo was removed from picture sites following it becoming a criminal offence. The photo was taken without Narinder’s knowledge or consent when it was sent to pictures sites by the paparazzi.
And Narinder Kaur has, apparently, reported this to the police.
Edit: missing words because I got a work call while typing…
I don’t understand how any women would be convinced to vote for his party. Between this and the Ava Evans comments he’s quite clearly a misogynist in the true sense of the word, not how it gets bandied about these days.
What a truly despicable man.
>In response Fox’s defence, another user replied: “Surely you must see that “mocking” someone isn’t on the same level as posting intimate images of them online without their consent. It’s like if someone said you were a racist, you couldn’t then accuse them of the crime of being a paedophile it’s not an equal response.”
Well that’s a far fetched hypothetical, I doubt old Laurence would ever find himself in a situation like that
This looks to be an open and shut case here. What he posted constitutes a criminal offence. He was asked to remove it and actively refused, even after it was pointed out that it was a criminal offence.
The man is both deranged and makes his political moves by just being a vile human-being as some form of political shock-jock to garner publicity.
In other words, a scumbag.
Hasn’t he just paid out £180k to two defendants? Lol, time to open your wallet again, Lozza.
Given that assault is a crime, I believe everyone who encounters Laurence Fox should cordially invite him to a boxing match.
Lol the irony of that twitter post he made in Dec 2023:
>Close the borders.
>Scrap the licence fee.
>Scrap Net Zero.
>Ban ESG and DEI.
>Cull the public sector by 80%
>Declare war on woke.
>Protect families.
>**Protect women.**
>Protect children.
>Reduce taxes.
>Instantiate free speech in UK law.
>Take back our institutions.
>It’s not hard.
Apparently it is hard for ol’ Lozza (or he just doesn’t think the brown ones count as women).
Is this guy allergic to money? Seems to hate hanging onto the stuff.
I’d forgoten this bell existed until I went to vote in the mayoral elections this morning and saw his name at the bottom of the list, along with all the other independent also-rans.
Wasn’t he done a few years ago for posting something on social media? Does this man ever learn?
Damn he’s really looking like someone left Oswald Mosely in the oven too long…
Is there ever a time when Fox isn’t in the news? He’s always doing wacked things, wonder if he’s on drugs?
Does this prick pose as if he’s talking to a crowd like Hitler used to? Certainly looks like it.
Just when you think he’s reached peak bellend, he goes and ups his game
S.33 Disclosing private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress – Criminal Justice and Courts Act.Â
Starting point for this incident would be about 26 weeks in chokey. (Assuming Higher Culpability and Medium Harm)
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/disclosing-private-sexual-images/
What a nasty little man he is.
What the hell is wrong with this guy, genuinely starting to wonder if he’s on crack, had a bad blow to the head or some sort of condition that affects rational and cognitive ability.Â
Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 part 1 section 33
It is an offence for a person to disclose a private sexual photograph or film if the disclosure is made—
(a)without the consent of an individual who appears in the photograph or film, and
(b)with the intention of causing that individual distress.
A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or a fine (or both), and
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine (or both).
Looks like porridge may be on the menu for Mr Fox
Was he a completely different person when Billie Piper met him? I am trying to fathom what she saw in him. I can only assume he has had a complete personality change since.
Judging by the photo atop the page Lozza seems keen to emulate Heinrich Himmler in both philosophy and appearance.
Worra bawbag.
 ‘**The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.**’
Whilst Fox has a wealthy backer (Jeremy Hosking) who funds his awful behaviour this basically gives him a free licence to act illegally and keep paying his way out.
A short custodial sentence however, even a few months, would scare the shit out of this braggard.
So my suggestion is the next time he can’t control himself, let’s skip the whole fines bit and look at some time away from the public?