Europe’s population crisis: see how your country compares with and without migration
Posted by 7ummel
Europe’s population crisis: see how your country compares with and without migration
Posted by 7ummel
9 Comments
Some hefty assumptions going on there, in both scenarios.
Who says lower populations are necessarily bad. We could retitle the graph to say ‘impact on planet’ with and without, or ‘or total resource consumption’ with and without,, or ‘wildlife populations’ with and without ….. Or ‘housing affordability’ with and without….I wonder what people would think then?
Another problem with this is it assumes immigration will continue to those countries after they’ve been destroyed by immigration.
Well, migration can be helpful if the people immigrating have a certain level of education and are able to and want to sustain themselves.
I think we all can agree on that?
There’s no advantage in mass immigration of uneducated people.
Please try to remember that gradual population decline is a good thing for the sustainability of the species.
That slider really needs to be the other way around.
That’s why Musk and the nativists want to stop immigration and force native born people to have more kids. It’s important to them to maintain native population growth.
Guardian is a progressive rag. Immigration is ruining the EU, except Hungary and Poland.
We need to start taxing those who decide not having children.
I’d be so happy if our population decreased. I think we’re way too many. We should leave some space to nature and other animals as well, and for me we shouldn’t be more than 4 billion people areound the globe.