People who reject other religions are also more likely to reject science. This psychological process is common in regions with low religious diversity, and therefore, high religious intolerance. Regions with religious tolerance have higher trust in science than regions with religious intolerance.
https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/4/pgae144/7656014
17 Comments
Abstract
“Past theories have linked science denial to religiosity but have not explained its geographic variability. We hypothesize that it springs not only from religious intensity but also from religious intolerance, which depends greatly on the experience of religious diversity and hence on geography. The belief that one’s religion trumps other faiths precipitates the stance that it trumps science too. This psychological process is most likely to operate in regions or countries with low religious heterogeneity. We measure the rejection of science not only in people’s refusal to follow specific health recommendations, such as taking COVID-19 vaccines, but also in general measures of scientific engagement and attainment. We rule out alternative explanations, including reverse causality and spurious correlations, by conducting controlled experiments and running robustness checks on our statistical models.”
Religious People are trapped in their own head. If they start thinking about death and the possibility that they’re wrong they Block their thoughts instantly.
Having anxiety about thoughts is something very bad for your own head. Your head should be the safest place.
Remember when religious institutions supported, or even outright funded, science & exploration, leading to an age of discovery and knowledge? Good times.
Pigheaded ignorance has no boundaries. Big news.
I’d say that they stay away from science because much of it contradicts their religion.
What?! Intolerant people are intolerant ?! That’s crazy.
Surely people that genuinely believe in one specific religion *have* to reject other religions? How can they think multiple mutually exclusive propositions are correct?
There’s a stark difference between a populus being intolerant and a government being in intolerant. A Fascist government wants only belief in their dear leaders.
As I despise all of them, am I a pure science guy?
I always appreciate a straight line through a *slightly* oblong blob.Â
Religious tolerance is an oxymoron.
The whole point of religion is to tell people what “God” will tolerate. Intolerable behavior is never tolerated.
Translation: Open-minded people are more open-minded
I don’t know why anyone would find this surprising. Religion is dogmatic, science is constantly open to revision. They are incompatible belief systems. You can’t be empirical and believe things solely on “faith.”
Religion dominates in areas where it is dominant.
Got it.
It would be interesting to see how “Internet Atheists” would fare on this one.
Tô clarify, i’m refering to those who basically became the esteriotype of atheists in places like reddit.
More psychology nonsense. Please post science
Dropping this here and leaving
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Temple-Precinct-as-drawn-by-Newton-in-Babson-MS-0434-with-kind-permission-of_fig1_237074676#:~:text=Newton%20claimed%20that%20the%20thirty,plan%20of%20Babson%20Ms%200434.