The criteria used are purely arbitrary. There is no objective way to sorts films based on this two criteria anyway.
In particular, the slope of the boundary lines (i.e. -0.5/decade for top lines and +3/decade for bottom) is arbitrary. I simply chose slopes that seemed to fit the “horn shape” made by the points on the graphic.
7 Comments
The criteria used are purely arbitrary. There is no objective way to sorts films based on this two criteria anyway.
In particular, the slope of the boundary lines (i.e. -0.5/decade for top lines and +3/decade for bottom) is arbitrary. I simply chose slopes that seemed to fit the “horn shape” made by the points on the graphic.
Data source: [https://developer.imdb.com/non-commercial-datasets/](https://developer.imdb.com/non-commercial-datasets/)
Tools: Matlab + Powerpoint
I’ve seen all of the top 10 and none of the outsider 10 or bottom 10. Guess I’m not very adventurous.
Fun fact: an anaptation of the Ramayana is found in both the “top 10 outsiders” and the “bottom 10 films”
This is awesome! Great job hahahaha
what’s going on in the bottom left? it’s so much less dense
Finally some genuinely good OC on this sub!
Thanks OP!
I think it be nice to see this as a heat map too. I am sure there are lots of overlap in those deep black sections.